Can sterilization of disposable face masks be an alternative for imported face masks? A nationwide field study including 19 sterilization departments and 471 imported brand types during COVID-19 shortages

被引：16

作者：

van Straten, B. ^{[1
]}

Robertson, P. D. ^{[1
]}

Oussoren, H. ^{[2
]}

Espindola, S. Pereira ^{[3
]}

Ghanbari, E. ^{[3
]}

Dankelman, J. ^{[1
]}

Picken, S. ^{[3
]}

Horeman, T. ^{[1
]}

Dhaka, Mahendra Singh ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept BioMech Engn, Delft, Netherlands

[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Delft, Netherlands

来源：

PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期

关键词：

MEDICAL DEVICES;

D O I：

10.1371/journal.pone.0257468

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Background Face masks, also referred to as half masks, are essential to protect healthcare professionals working in close contact with patients with COVID-19-related symptoms. Because of the Corona material shortages, healthcare institutions sought an approach to reuse face masks or to purchase new, imported masks. The filter quality of these masks remained unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the quality of sterilized and imported FFP2/KN95 face masks. Methods A 48-minute steam sterilization process of single-use FFP2/KN95 face masks with a 15 minute holding time at 121 degrees C was developed, validated and implemented in the Central Sterilization Departments (CSSD) of 19 different hospitals. Masks sterilized by steam and H2O2 plasma as well as new, imported masks were tested for particle filtration efficiency (PFE) and pressure drop in a custom-made test setup. Results The results of 84 masks tested on the PFE dry particle test setup showed differences of 2.32% (mean +/- SD). Test data showed that the mean PFE values of 444 sterilized FFP2 face masks from the 19 CSSDs were 90 +/- 11% (mean +/- SD), and those of 474 new, imported KN95/FFP2 face masks were 83 +/- 16% (mean +/- SD). Differences in PFE of masks received from different sterilization departments were found. Conclusion Face masks can be reprocessed with 121 degrees C steam or H2O2 plasma sterilization with a minimal reduction in PFE. PFE comparison between filter material of sterilized masks and new, imported masks indicates that the filter material of most reprocessed masks of high quality brands can outperform new, imported face masks of unknown brands. Although the PFE of tested face masks from different sterilization departments remained efficient, using different types of sterilization equipment, can result in different PFE outcomes.

引用

页数：13

共 23 条

[1]

Ait Addi R., 2020, J CLIN EXP INVEST, V11, DOI [10.5799/jcei/7894, DOI 10.5799/JCEI/7894]

[2]

[Anonymous], 2009, 149A1 NENEN

[3]

Bergman MS, 2010, J ENG FIBER FABR, V5, P33

[4] REUSE OF DISPOSABLE MEDICAL DEVICES IN CANADIAN HOSPITALS [J].