The Green-Innovation-Inducing Effect of a Unit Progressive Carbon Tax

被引:6
作者
Yu, Xiao [1 ]
Xu, Yingdong [2 ]
Sun, Meng [1 ]
Zhang, Yanzhe [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Northeast Asian Res Ctr, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Northeast Asian Studies Coll, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon tax; green-innovation-inducing effect; progressive tax rate; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE POLICY; CO2; EMISSIONS; PATH; INSTRUMENTS; COMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; TRANSITION; TAXATION;
D O I
10.3390/su132111708
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The major global economies are facing increasing pressure to reduce their carbon emissions. Introducing environmental policy instruments to stimulate green innovation is key to mitigating global warming. We propose a carbon tax design with a typical green innovation orientation that links carbon taxes with the low-carbon technology (LCT) of enterprises and imposes a progressive tax on heterogeneous enterprises with LCT stock to encourage green innovation. This study used a dynamic evolution game model based on the Stackelberg model of heterogeneous enterprises with LCT stock to analyze the green-innovation-inducing effect of unit progressive carbon taxes. A unit progressive carbon tax could encourage enterprises to participate in green innovation, regardless of their initial green innovation willingness. The progressive tax rate was more effective than a fixed rate for stimulating green innovation by all enterprises. There was a marginal diminishing effect of increases in the tax rate. An increase in the innovation cost coefficient of enterprises reduced the green-innovation-inducing effect of the unit progressive carbon tax. Increasing the tax rate was effective only under normal circumstances. A decline in the carbon reduction in enterprises also reduced the green-innovation-inducing effect of the unit progressive carbon tax. Furthermore, increasing the tax rate when the carbon reduction amount was extremely low caused enterprises to abandon green innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Directed technical change [J].
Acemoglu, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (04) :781-809
[2]   Transition to Clean Technology [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Hanley, Douglas ;
Kerr, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :52-104
[3]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[4]  
Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
[5]   Introducing carbon taxes in South Africa [J].
Alton, Theresa ;
Arndt, Channing ;
Davies, Rob ;
Hartley, Faaiqa ;
Makrelov, Konstantin ;
Thurlow, James ;
Ubogu, Dumebi .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 :344-354
[6]   Profit-maximizing R&D in response to a random carbon tax [J].
Baker, E ;
Shittu, E .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (02) :160-180
[7]   A future for carbon taxes [J].
Baranzini, A ;
Goldemberg, J ;
Speck, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (03) :395-412
[8]   A UK CARBON ENERGY TAX - THE MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS [J].
BARKER, T ;
BAYLIS, S ;
MADSEN, P .
ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (03) :296-308
[9]   Carbon tax simulations using a household demand model [J].
Brännlund, R ;
Nordström, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (01) :211-233
[10]   Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Larsen, BM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (04) :493-505