Burn Scar Assessment: A Systematic Review of Different Scar Scales

被引:89
作者
Brusselaers, Nele [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pirayesh, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Hoeksema, Henk [3 ,4 ]
Verbelen, Jozef [3 ,4 ]
Blot, Stijn [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Monstrey, Stan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med Infect Dis & Psychosomat Me, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Burn Unit, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[5] Hogesch Gent, Healthcare Dept, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
burn injury; scar assessment; scar scales; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT; HYPERTROPHIC SCARS; FEASIBLE TOOL; DLQI SCORES; RELIABILITY; PATIENT; INJURY; SATISFACTION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.056
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Scars can be devastating and disfiguring, because they are clearly visible, stigmatizing, and permanent reminders of the initial accident or surgical event. Yet, there is still no consensus about the optimal scale or tool to assess the characteristics and evolution. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical importance of scar scales specifically developed for burn scars. Materials and Methods. The systematic literature search involved PubMed and the Web of Science (including Science Citation Index). Results. The search resulted in 29 articles (including seven reviews) dealing with a new, modified, or validated scale. Scar scales assess several characteristics, of which color, pliability, and thickness were considered the most important. Physical limitation, pain, and pruritus are often more disturbing than the appearance of the scar, and are therefore also introduced in scar evaluation, as well as the interference with daily life activities (e.g., psychologic impact). Conclusion. In contrast to the more objective scar assessment tools, scar scales usually cover more aspects of the scars and are less time-consuming in clinical practice. However, no strong conclusions can be made about their efficacy and validity. In addition to digital photography, scar scales are a valuable instrument in the clinical evaluation and follow-up of scars. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E115 / E123
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Abdullah A., 1994, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V15, P164, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199403000-00011
[2]   Improved scar quality following primary and secondary healing of cutaneous wounds [J].
Atiyeh, BS ;
Amm, CA ;
El Musa, KA .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 27 (05) :411-417
[3]   DLQI scores in patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars: a prospective case control study [J].
Balci, Didem Didar ;
Inandi, Tacettin ;
Dogramaci, Cigdem Asena ;
Celik, Ebru .
JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2009, 7 (08) :688-691
[4]  
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[5]   Skin scarring [J].
Bayat, A ;
McGrouther, DA ;
Ferguson, MWJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7380) :88-92
[6]   A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment [J].
Beausang, E ;
Floyd, H ;
Dunn, KW ;
Orton, CI ;
Ferguson, MWJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (06) :1954-1961
[7]   Development and validation of a model for prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury [J].
Blot, S. ;
Brusselaers, N. ;
Monstrey, S. ;
Vandewoude, K. ;
De Waele, J. J. ;
Colpaert, K. ;
Decruyenaere, J. ;
Malbrain, M. ;
Lafaire, C. ;
Fauville, J-P. ;
Jennes, S. ;
Casaer, M. P. ;
Muller, J. ;
Jacquemin, D. ;
De Bacquer, D. ;
Hoste, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (01) :111-117
[8]   Quality of life of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scarring [J].
Bock, O ;
Schmid-Ott, G ;
Malewski, P ;
Mrowietz, U .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 297 (10) :433-438
[9]   Laser Doppler imaging of burn scars: a comparison of wavelength and scanning methods [J].
Bray, R ;
Forrester, K ;
Leonard, C ;
McArthur, R ;
Tulip, J ;
Lindsay, R .
BURNS, 2003, 29 (03) :199-206
[10]  
BROU JA, 1989, J BURN CARE REHABIL, V10, P550