A multi-objective feedback approach for evaluating sequential conceptual building design decisions

被引:44
作者
Basbagill, John P. [1 ]
Flager, Forest L. [1 ]
Lepech, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Life-cycle cost; Environmental impact; Multidisciplinary design optimization; Sequential decisions; Conceptual building design; GENETIC ALGORITHM; OFFICE BUILDINGS; THERMAL DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.015
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Conceptual design decision-making plays a critical role in determining life-cycle environmental impact and cost performance of buildings. Stakeholders often make these decisions without a quantitative understanding of how a particular decision will impact future choices or a project's ultimate performance. The proposed sequential decision support methodology provides stakeholders with quantitative information on the relative influence conceptual design stage decisions have on a project's life-cycle environmental impact and life-cycle cost. A case study is presented showing how the proposed methodology may be used by designers considering these performance criteria Sensitivity analysis is performed on thousands of computationally generated building alternatives. Results are presented in the form of probabilistic distributions showing the degree to which each decision helps in achieving a given performance criterion. The method provides environmental impact and cost feedback throughout the sequential building design process, thereby guiding designers in creating low-carbon, low-cost buildings at the conceptual design phase. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 150
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AIAA, 1991, CURR STAT ART MULT D
[2]  
AlHomoud MS, 1997, INT J ENERG RES, V21, P941, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(199708)21:10<941::AID-ER302>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-Y
[4]   Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings [J].
ALwaer, H. ;
Clements-Croome, D. J. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (04) :799-807
[5]   Architects need environmental feedback [J].
Andreu, IC ;
Oreszczyn, T .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2004, 32 (04) :313-328
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DPROFILER REV 2 0
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MODELCENTER VERS 10
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, VERS 7 3 2
[9]  
[Anonymous], EQUEST VERS 3 64
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 7 INT IBPSA