Interpretation of piezocone penetration and dissipation tests in sensitive Leda clay at Gloucester test site

被引:16
作者
Agaiby, Shehab S. [1 ]
Mayne, Paul W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Geosyst Grp, Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
clays; cone penetrometer; in situ testing; overconsolidation ratio; piezocone; preconsolidation; sensitive clays; yield stresses; UNDRAINED SHEAR-STRENGTH; PRECONSOLIDATION PRESSURE; STRESS HISTORY; CONSOLIDATION; COEFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1139/cgj-2017-0388
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A modified piezocone penetration test (CPTu) analytical solution based on spherical cavity expansion and critical state soil mechanics (SCE-CSSM) is employed for assessing yield stress, undrained shear strength, and flow parameters in sensitive Leda clay at the Gloucester test site. For sensitive and structured clays, the formulation relies on the mobilized effective stress friction angle (phi') defined at two parts of the stress-strain curve: (i) peak stress (phi(qmax)') and (ii) maximum obliquity (phi(MO)'). Input parameters for assessing the overconsolidation ratio (OCR = sigma(p)'/sigma(vo)', where sigma(p)' is preconsolidation stress and sigma(vo)' is current effective vertical stress) from CPTu results include: undrained rigidity index (IR = G/S-u, where G is shear modulus and S-u undrained shear strength), plastic volumetric strain potential (Lambda = 1- (C-s/C-c), where C-s is swelling index and C-c is virgin compression index), and effective friction angles (phi(qmax)' and phi(MO)'). A direct CPTu means of assessing the undrained rigidity index in a reliable manner is also developed that gives the N-kt cone factor and matches profiles of undrained shear strength from triaxial compression tests (S-uTC). The modified solution is also implemented on two additional sites: a sensitive-quick clay in Norway and structured varved clay from New England. Interpretations of the coefficient of consolidation and permeability from pore-water pressure dissipation tests at Gloucester are evaluated using the SCE-CSSM formulation and shown to be comparable with independent laboratory and field tests.
引用
收藏
页码:1781 / 1794
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Ahnberg H., 2003, 61 SGI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 4.08, DOI [DOI 10.1520/D5778-12, 10.1520/D5778-12]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement, DOI DOI 10.1520/D2435_D2435M-11R20
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, C39C39M 10 STANDARD, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1520/D2487-11, 10.1520/D2487-17E01]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, RES REP NO GIT CEEGE
[7]  
ASTM International, 2012, D4186/D4186M-12e1, DOI [10.1520/D4186_D4186M-12E01, DOI 10.1520/D4186_D4186M-12E01]
[8]   UNDRAINED DEEP PENETRATION .2. PORE PRESSURES [J].
BALIGH, MM .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1986, 36 (04) :487-501
[9]   Test fill on soft plastic marine clay at Onsoy, Norway [J].
Berre, Toralv .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01) :30-50
[10]  
Bjerrum L., 1960, P ASCE RESERACH C SH, P711