Recognizing pharmaceutical illiteracy in community pharmacy: Agreement between a practice-based interview guide and questionnaire based assessment

被引:17
作者
Koster, Ellen S. [1 ]
Philbert, Daphne [1 ]
van Dijk, Liset [2 ]
Rademakers, Jany [2 ,3 ]
de Smet, Peter A. G. M. [4 ,5 ]
Bouvy, Marcel L. [1 ]
Vervloet, Marcia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Pharm Practice Network Educ & Res UPPER, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] NIVEL, Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] KNMP, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Assoc, The Hague, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Pharm & IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Health literacy; Medication; Pharmaceutical literacy; Pharmacy; CRITICAL HEALTH LITERACY; NETHERLANDS; EDUCATION; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.01.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy are at increased risk of drug-related problems. Recognizing these patients in daily practice is difficult. The Recognition and Addressing of Limited Pharmaceutical Literacy (RALPH) interview guide was developed as practical set of questions to recognize patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy in daily pharmacy practice. Objective: To compare agreement between pharmaceutical literacy measured with the RALPH guide and a validated general health literacy questionnaire. In addition, we provide insight into patients' pharmaceutical literacy using the RALPH interview guide. Methods: Structured face-to-face interviews with patients who visited a community pharmacy to fill a prescription for themselves were conducted. The interview included the RALPH guide as well as the Functional Communicative Critical Health Literacy (FCCHL) questionnaire to measure general health literacy. Functional, communicative and critical skills were measured and agreement between two methods was calculated. Results: Data were collected from 508 patients. Patients with limited pharmaceutical literacy, indicated by the RALPH questions, also had a lower general health literacy level according to FCCHL scores. Agreement between the RALPH guide and FCCHL questionnaire was moderate (similar to 60%) for the three health literacy domains. Most patients ( > 90%) had correct understanding of frequency and timing of medication use, but 25% did not understand warnings or precautions correctly. Finding understandable information (39%), assessing information applicability (50%) and reliability (64%) were mentioned as difficult by patients. Conclusion: Patients experienced difficulties with more complex skills, e.g. interpretation of warnings or precautions when using a medicine, finding and analyzing medication information. Whereas the FCCHL questionnaire is useful to assess general health literacy, the RALPH interview guide provides insight in the level of skills needed for good medication use and is more suitable for use in a medication specific context such as community pharmacy. Context specific assessment of skills is important to provide tailored pharmaceutical care.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 816
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Optimal health literacy measurement for the clinical setting: A systematic review [J].
Duell, Paul ;
Wright, David ;
Renzaho, Andre M. N. ;
Bhattacharya, Debi .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (11) :1295-1307
[2]   Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study [J].
Feehan, M. ;
Walsh, M. ;
Godin, J. ;
Sundwall, D. ;
Munger, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 42 (06) :738-749
[3]   Applicability of Internationally Available Health Literacy Measures in the Netherlands [J].
Fransen, M. P. ;
Van Schaik, T. M. ;
Twickler, T. B. ;
Essink-Bot, M. L. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 :134-149
[4]   Health Literacy Measurement: An Inventory and Descriptive Summary of 51 Instruments [J].
Haun, Jolie N. ;
Valerio, Melissa A. ;
McCormack, Lauren A. ;
Sorensen, Kristine ;
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2014, 19 :302-333
[5]   Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management [J].
Heijmans, Monique ;
Waverijn, Geeke ;
Rademakers, Jany ;
van der Vaart, Rosalie ;
Rijken, Mieke .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (01) :41-48
[6]   Different Measures, Different Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Performance-Based versus Self-Reported Measures of Health Literacy and Numeracy [J].
Kiechle, Eric S. ;
Bailey, Stacy Cooper ;
Hedlund, Laurie A. ;
Viera, Anthony J. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (10) :1538-1546
[7]   Health literacy of patients admitted for elective surgery [J].
Koster E.S. ;
Schmidt A. ;
Philbert D. ;
van de Garde E.M.W. ;
Bouvy M.L. .
Journal of Public Health, 2017, 25 (2) :181-186
[8]   These patients look lost - Community pharmacy staff's identification and support of patients with limited health literacy [J].
Koster, Ellen S. ;
Philbert, Daphne ;
Blom, Lyda ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2016, 24 (06) :403-410
[9]   Health literacy among pharmacy visitors in the Netherlands [J].
Koster, Ellen S. ;
Philbert, Daphne ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 (07) :716-721
[10]   The Utrecht Pharmacy Practice network for Education and Research: a network of community and hospital pharmacies in the Netherlands [J].
Koster, Ellen S. ;
Blom, Lyda ;
Philbert, Daphne ;
Rump, Willem ;
Bouvy, Marcel L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2014, 36 (04) :669-674