How Team-Level and Individual-Level Conflict Influences Team Commitment: A Multilevel Investigation

被引:18
作者
Lee, Sanghyun [1 ]
Kwon, Seungwoo [2 ]
Shin, Shung J. [3 ]
Kim, MinSoo [1 ]
Park, In-Jo [4 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Sch Business, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Portland State Univ, Sch Business, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[4] Wuhan Univ, Sch Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
individual-level conflict; team-level conflict; task conflict; relationship conflict; team commitment; multilevel analysis; STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; TASK CONFLICT; DIALECTICAL INQUIRY; INTRAGROUP CONFLICT; DEVILS ADVOCACY; PERFORMANCE; DIVERSITY; WORK; PARADOX;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02365
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigate how two different types of conflict (task conflict and relationship conflict) at two different levels (individual-level and team-level) influence individual team commitment. The analysis was conducted using data we collected from 193 employees in 31 branch offices of a Korean commercial bank. The relationships at multiple levels were tested using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The results showed that individual-level relationship conflict was negatively related to team commitment while individual-level task conflict was not. In addition, both team-level task and relationship conflict were negatively associated with team commitment. Finally, only team-level relationship conflict significantly moderated the relationship between individual-level relationship conflict and team commitment. We further derive theoretical implications of these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   MEASURES OF INEQUALITY [J].
ALLISON, PD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (06) :865-880
[3]   RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE [J].
AMASON, AC ;
SCHWEIGER, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1994, 5 (03) :239-253
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONFLICT RESOLUTION
[5]   Modeling work group effectiveness in high-technology manufacturing environments [J].
Bailey, DE .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2000, 32 (04) :361-368
[6]  
Baron R., 1991, EMPLOY RESPONSIB RIG, V4, P25, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01390436
[7]   ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BARON, RM .
SCIENCE, 1965, 147 (3654) :140-&
[8]   Should I stay or should i go? Predicting team members' intent to remain in the team [J].
Bayazit, M ;
Mannix, EA .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (03) :290-321
[10]  
Bishop JW, 2000, J APPL PSYCHOL, V85, P439, DOI [10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.439, 10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.439]