Structural Functionality Scale for Light-Framed Wood Buildings with Indicators for Windstorm Damage

被引:11
作者
Nevill, Justin B. [1 ]
Lombardo, Franklin T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Champaign, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Functionality; Resilience; Wind damage; Tornado; Thunderstorm; Multihazard; RESILIENCE; EARTHQUAKE; WIND; PERFORMANCE; FRAGILITY; RECOVERY; JOPLIN;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002551
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A new, broadly applicable scale for measuring the structural functionality of light-framed wood buildings provides a foundation for progress in disaster and resilience research. Existing scales commonly used in resilience analysis are designed to measure damage and do not resolve functionality, the stated metric of most resilience models. The structural functionality of a building is defined as the ability of the building to provide the primary function as a shelter. Total functionality for a building includes additional nonstructural components, such as electric power, water, and transportation access. The structural functionality scale for light-framed wood buildings is designed to measure structural functionality directly. A set of structural functionality indicators for wind-damaged buildings provides a metric with distinguishable discrete indicators on the continuous structural functionality scale. The structural functionality indicators were designed to provide compatibility with existing scales related to wind damage. General guidelines for similarly metered indicators on the structural functionality scale provide a basis for measuring the impact of other hazards. The structural functionality scale and indicators provide a reference for comparison between resilience models and allow empirical measurements of structural functionality and resilience. Once adopted in conceptual resilience models, the structural functionality scale will provide a basis for validation with empirical measures. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Empirical tornado resilience model for light-framed wood residential buildings
    Nevill, Justin B.
    Lombardo, Franklin T.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 231
  • [2] Performance and risk to light-framed wood residential buildings subjected to tornadoes
    Maloney, Timothy
    Ellingwood, Bruce
    Mahmoud, Hussam
    Wang, Naiyu
    Wang, Yingjun
    Lin, Peihui
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2018, 70 : 35 - 47
  • [3] Life-cycle cost and carbon footprint analysis for light-framed residential buildings subjected to tornado hazard
    Adhikari, Pramodit
    Mahmoud, Hussam
    Xie, Aiwen
    Simonen, Kathrina
    Ellingwood, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2020, 32
  • [4] Finite-element modeling of a light-framed wood roof structure
    Jacklin, Ryan B.
    Damatty, Ashraf A. El
    Dessouki, Ahmed A.
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 19 (06) : 603 - 621
  • [5] Statistical and analytical models for roof components in existing light-framed wood structures
    Shanmugam, Bagyalakshmi
    Nielson, Bryant G.
    Prevatt, David O.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (11) : 2607 - 2616
  • [6] Assembly Solution for Modular Buildings: Development of an Automated Connecting Device for Light-Framed Structures
    Picard, Laurence
    Blanchet, Pierre
    Begin-Drolet, Andre
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [7] Uplift Capacity Evaluation of Light-framed Wood Structure's Roof-to-wall Connections
    Li, Yuanhe
    Yao, Lihong
    Song, Yi
    Liu, Ruijng
    Wu, Yueqi
    Chang, Siyu
    Yu, Xia
    Zhang, Ziyang
    Chen, Chang
    BIORESOURCES, 2022, 17 (03): : 4532 - 4558
  • [8] Sensitivity of Load Distribution in Light-Framed Wood Roof Systems due to Typical Modeling Parameters
    Shivarudrappa, Ranjith
    Nielson, Bryant G.
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2013, 27 (03) : 222 - 234
  • [9] Seismic loss and damage in light-frame wood buildings from sequences of induced earthquakes
    Chase, Robert E.
    Liel, Abbie B.
    Luco, Nicolas
    Baird, Bridger W.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2019, 48 (12) : 1365 - 1383