Variation in type and frequency of diagnostic imaging during trauma care across multiple time points by patient insurance type

被引:7
作者
Bell, Nathaniel [2 ]
Reparaz, Laura [2 ]
Fry, William R. [1 ,3 ]
Smith, R. Stephen [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Luis, Alejandro [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Surg, Columbia, SC USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Good Samaritan Hosp, Dept Surg, Lafayette, CO USA
[4] Univ Florida, Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Palmetto Hlth Surg Specialists, Columbia, SC USA
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Diagnostic imaging; Health equity; Wounds and injuries; Trauma centers; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT DISPOSITION; RESOURCE UTILIZATION; BRAIN-INJURY; PAYER STATUS; MORTALITY; DISPARITIES; RACE; OUTCOMES; COVERAGE; BLUNT;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-016-0146-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Research has shown that uninsured patients receive fewer radiographic studies during trauma care, but less is known as to whether differences in care are present among other insurance groups or across different time points during hospitalization. Our objective was to examine the number of radiographic studies administered to a cohort of trauma patients over the entire hospital stay as well as during the first 24-hours of care. Methods: Patient data were obtained from an American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified Level I Trauma Center between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. We used negative binomial regression to construct relative risk (RR) ratios for type and frequency of radiographic imaging received among persons with Medicare, Medicaid, no insurance, or government insurance plans in reference to those with commercial indemnity plans. The analysis was adjusted for patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, injury severity score, injury mechanism, comorbidities, complications, hospital length of stay, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Results: A total of 3621 records from surviving patients age > = 18 years were assessed. After adjustment for potential confounders, the expected number of radiographic studies decreased by 15 % among Medicare recipients (RR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.78-0.93), 11 % among Medicaid recipients (0.89, 0.81-0.99), 10 % among the uninsured (0.90, 0. 85-0.96) and 19 % among government insurance groups (0.81, 0.72-0.90), compared with the reference group. This disparity was observed during the first 24-hours of care among patients with Medicare (0.78, 0.71-0.86) and government insurance plans (0.83, 0.74-0.94). Overall, there were no differences in the number of radiographic studies among the uninsured or among Medicaid patients during the first 24-hours of care compared with the reference group, but differences were observed among the uninsured in a sub-analysis of severely injured patients (ISS > 15). Conclusions: Both uninsured and insured patients treated at a not-for-profit verified Level I Trauma Center receive fewer radiographic studies than patients with commercial indemnity plans, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic confounders. There is less disparity in care during the first 24-hours, which suggests that patient pathology is the determining factor for radiographic evaluation during the acute care phase. Results from this study offer initial evidence of disparity in diagnostic imaging across multiple insurance groups over different periods of trauma care.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Variation in type and frequency of diagnostic imaging during trauma care across multiple time points by patient insurance type
    Nathaniel Bell
    Laura Repáraz
    William R. Fry
    R. Stephen Smith
    Alejandro Luis
    BMC Medical Imaging, 16
  • [2] Role of Patient Characteristics and Insurance Type in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Care Disparities
    Gasoyan, Hamlet
    Anwer, Faiz
    Casacchia, Nicholas J.
    Kovach, Jeffrey D.
    Valent, Jason
    Wang, Ming
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2024, 20 (05) : 699 - 707