Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility

被引:25
作者
Guidetti, Laura [1 ]
Placentino, Umberto [1 ]
Baldari, Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Foro Italico, Div Hlth Sci, Dept Movement Human & Hlth Sci, Piazza L De Bosis 15, I-00135 Rome, Italy
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2017年 / 30卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
cervical range of motion; iPhone; fluid inclinometer; neck disorders; reliability; criterion validity; minimum detectable change; STATISTICAL-METHODS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; SHOULDER RANGE; MOTION; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000364
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design:In this observational study, we compare fluid inclinometer and smartphone measures to analyze active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in healthy individuals.Objective:The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and the criterion validity of a smartphone application to analyze head movements.Summary of Background Data:Recent studies on the reliability and the validity of customized smartphone applications to measure ACROM show good results for frontal and lateral planes' movement analysis, but poor results for the transverse plane. This can be due to the surrounding magnetic fields that affect the compass application used during head rotation valuation.Methods:Twenty-three individuals were asked to perform neck maximal (end-range) movements (frontal flex-extension and left-right side flexion in the sitting position, left-right rotation in the prone position). Two separate examiners took all ACROM measures and were assigned to each device (iPhone 5c and the inclinometer) contemporary for each individual.Results:All measurements were taken twice to assess the intraobserver reliability. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The criterion validity between the 2 instruments was also assessed in terms of the ICC. The procedures used in this investigation for measuring ACROM yielded good validity (Pearson r0.99 and ICC0.99) between the 2 instruments for all movements. The Bland and Altman's 95% LoA ranged from -1.8 to 1.15 degrees. Percentage error values ranged from 1% to 3%. The intrarater and the interrater reliabilities were good (ICC0.9) for both instruments in all movements including the rotation movements (ICC>0.95). The minimal detectable change (MDC95) ranged from 4 to 8 degrees.Conclusions:This study confirms that the tested smartphone is valid and reliable to measure ACROM on the frontal and the sagittal planes; furthermore, it also demonstrates its usefulness for rotation movement analysis, using the inclinometric application.
引用
收藏
页码:E1359 / E1366
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118032923
[2]  
Apple A7 Teardown, 2013, APPLE A7 TEARDOWN
[3]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[4]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]  
Bogduk N, 1984, Aust Fam Physician, V13, P26
[7]   Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review [J].
de Koning, Chantal H. P. ;
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. ;
Staal, J. Bart ;
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. ;
Hendriks, Erik J. M. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (07) :905-921
[8]  
Dixon-Warren J, 2014, COMPARING INVENSENSE
[9]  
Dixon-Warren J, 2010, MOTION SENSING IPHON
[10]   Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy [J].
Haley, SM ;
Fragala-Pinkham, MA .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (05) :735-743