Instructional design framework for educational media

被引:9
作者
Sangsawang, Thosporn [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajamangala Univ Technol Thunyaburi, Fac Tech Educ, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, IETC 2014 | 2015年 / 176卷
关键词
Instructional Design; framework; Educational Media; Synthesis; Delphi technique;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.445
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purposes of this study are to 1) synthesize an instructional design framework from the three instructional design theories, and 2) create an instructional design framework for educational media, and 3) study students' opinions for educational media. The synthesis was first made through the Delphi technique with 17experts to identify their perspectives on the three instructional design theories. The sampling group was 42 undergraduate students of Rajamangala University of Technology Thunyaburi, Thailand. The instruments were educational media according to Instructional design framework; an achievement test; and a questionnaire to assess students' opinions toward the developed educational media. Statistical procedures for data analysis included the E-1/E-2, mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The results revealed that the framework provides excellent potential for development and evaluation. The study confirmed that for instruction to be successful, various aspects of the environment should be considered such as application of domain knowledge, conceptual theory, and evaluation of the overall quality of the designed environment. Educational media had the efficiency at the 82.5/80.5 efficiency criteria, students were learned from the packages achieved significant learning progress at the .05 level and their opinions were at the highly agreement level regarding the appropriateness of the instructional media. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 80
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design [J].
Robert A. Reiser .
Educational Technology Research and Development, 2001, 49 :57-67
[42]   FROM BEHAVIORISM INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN TO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IN THE COMPLEXITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION [J].
Duran Gonzalez, Rosa Elena ;
Raesfeld, Lydia ;
Medecigo Shej, Amira .
REVISTA INCLUSIONES, 2019, 6 (01) :120-130
[43]   An exploration of how learning design and educational technology programs prepare instructional designers to evaluate in practice [J].
DeVaughn, Philena ;
Stefaniak, Jill .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 68 (06) :3299-3326
[44]   Competency education from visual literacy and Gaming for educational innovation: proposal for an instructional course design [J].
Marzal Garcia-Quismondo, Miguel Angel ;
Parra Valero, Pablo .
IBERSID-REVISTA DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION Y DOCUMENTACION, 2021, 15 (01) :75-83
[45]   An exploration of how learning design and educational technology programs prepare instructional designers to evaluate in practice [J].
Philena DeVaughn ;
Jill Stefaniak .
Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020, 68 :3299-3326
[46]   An instructional design framework to improve student learning in a first-year engineering class [J].
Yelamarthi K. ;
Drake E. ;
Prewett M. .
Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 2016, 15 :195-222
[47]   An Instructional Design Framework to Improve Student Learning in a First-Year Engineering Class [J].
Yelamarthi, Kumar ;
Drake, Eron ;
Prewett, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-INNOVATIONS IN PRACTICE, 2016, 15 :195-222
[48]   EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN FRAMEWORK BASED ON COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY FOR CLINICAL SKILLS TRAINING [J].
Wasfy, Nourhan F. ;
Abed, Rabab Abdel Raoof ;
Gouda, Enas Mohamed ;
Ghaly, Mona Sayed ;
El-Wazir, Yasser Mohamed .
ADVANCED EDUCATION, 2021, (18) :102-108
[49]   Open Instructional Design [J].
Kumar, Vive ;
Manimalar, Priyaadharshini ;
Somasundaram, Thamaraiselvi ;
Sidhan, Mohan ;
Lee, Stella ;
El-Kadi, Munir .
2009 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION (T4E 2009), 2009, :42-+
[50]   The Utility of Design Thinking to Promote Systemic Instructional Design Practices in the Workplace [J].
Stefaniak, Jill .
TECHTRENDS, 2020, 64 (02) :202-210