Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida

被引:54
作者
Vadaparampil, S. T. [1 ]
Scherr, C. L. [1 ]
Cragun, D. [1 ]
Malo, T. L. [1 ]
Pal, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Div Populat Sci, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
BRCA; genetic counseling; genetic testing; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; non-genetics professionals; NATIONAL SOCIETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PRACTITIONERS; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; MODELS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/cge.12405
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer now includes practitioners from multiple healthcare professions, specialties, and settings. This study examined whether non-genetics professionals (NGPs) perform guideline-based patient intake and informed consent before genetic testing. NGPs offering BRCA testing services in Florida (n=386) were surveyed about clinical practices. Among 81 respondents (response rate=22%), approximately half reported: sometimes scheduling a separate session for pre-test counseling lasting 11-30min prior to testing, discussing familial implications of testing, benefits and limitations of risk management options, and discussing the potential psychological impact and insurance-related issues. Few constructed a three-generation pedigree, discussed alternative hereditary cancer syndromes, or the meaning of a variant result. This lack of adherence to guideline-based practice may result in direct harm to patients and their family members. NGPs who are unable to deliver guideline adherent cancer genetics services should focus on identification and referral of at-risk patients to in person or telephone services provided by genetics professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 477
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P957, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a106d4
[2]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]   New developments in genetics - knowledge, attitudes and information needs of practice nurses [J].
Bankhead, C ;
Emery, J ;
Qureshi, N ;
Campbell, H ;
Austoker, J ;
Watson, E .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2001, 18 (05) :475-486
[4]  
Bensend TA, 2013, J GENET COUNS, P1
[5]   Outcomes from intensive training in genetic cancer risk counseling for clinicians [J].
Blazer, KR ;
MacDonald, DJ ;
Ricker, C ;
Sand, S ;
Uman, GC ;
Weitzel, JN .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 7 (01) :40-47
[6]   Adverse Events in Cancer Genetic Testing Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Financial Implications [J].
Brierley, Karina L. ;
Blouch, Erica ;
Cogswell, Whitney ;
Homer, Jeanne P. ;
Pencarinha, Debbie ;
Stanislaw, Christine L. ;
Matloff, Ellen T. .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2012, 18 (04) :303-309
[7]  
Brierley Karina L, 2010, Conn Med, V74, P413
[8]   American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Bruinooge, SS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) :2397-2406
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V27, P603
[10]  
Cohen S. A., 2013, Community Oncol, V10, P227, DOI [10.12788/j.cmonc.0031, DOI 10.12788/J.CMONC.0031]