Hospitalization Outcomes Among Patients With COVID-19 Undergoing Remote Monitoring

被引:22
作者
Crotty, Bradley H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Yilu [1 ]
Laud, Purushottam [1 ]
Hanson, Ryan J. [1 ,2 ]
Gershkowitz, Bradley [1 ,2 ]
Penlesky, Annie C. [1 ]
Shah, Neemit [1 ,2 ]
Anderes, Michael [2 ]
Green, Erin [2 ]
Fickel, Karen [2 ]
Singh, Siddhartha [1 ]
Somai, Melek M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Adv Populat Sci, Collaborat Healthcare Delivery Sci, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Wisconsin Hlth Network, Froedtert & Med Coll, Incept Labs, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
DISPARITIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Health care systems have implemented remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs to manage patients with COVID-19 at home, but the associations between participation and outcomes or resource utilization are unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess whether an RPM program for COVID-19 is associated with lower or higher likelihood of hospitalization and whether patients who are admitted present earlier or later for hospital care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective, observational, cohort study of RPM was performed at Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin Health Network, an academic health system in southeastern Wisconsin. Participants included patients with internal primary care physicians and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in the ambulatory setting between March 30, 2020, and December 15, 2020. Data analysis was performed from February 15, 2021, to February 2, 2022. EXPOSURES Activation of RPM program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Hospitalizations within 2 to 14 days of a positive test. Inverse propensity score weighting was used to account for differences between groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed looking at usage of the RPM among patients who activated the program. RESULTS A total of 10 660 COVID-19-positive ambulatory patients were eligible, and 9378 (88.0%) had email or mobile numbers on file and were invited into the RPM program; the mean (SD) age was 46.9 (16.3) years and 5448 patients (58.1%) were women. Patients who activated monitoring (5364 patients [57.2%]) had a mean (SD) of 35.3 (33.0) check-ins and a mean (SD) of 1.27 (2.79) (median [IQR], 0 [0-1]) free-text comments. A total of 878 patients (16.4%) experienced at least 1 alert; 128 of 5364 activated patients (2.4%) and 158 of 4014 inactivated patients (3.9%) were hospitalized (chi(2)(1) = 18.65; P < .001). In weighted regression analysis, activation of RPM was associated with a lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86; P = .001) adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and time period. Monitored patients had a longer mean (SD) time between test and hospitalization (6.67 [3.21] days vs 5.24 [3.03] days), a shorter length of stay (4.44 [4.43] days vs 7.14 [8.63] days), and less intensive care use (15 patients [0.3%] vs 44 patients [1.1%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that activation of an RPM program is associated with lower hospitalization, intensive care use, and length of stay among patients with COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants [J].
Abu-Raddad, Laith J. ;
Chemaitelly, Hiam ;
Butt, Adeel A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (02) :187-189
[2]   Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program [J].
Annis, Tucker ;
Pleasants, Susan ;
Hultman, Gretchen ;
Lindemann, Elizabeth ;
Thompson, Joshua A. ;
Billecke, Stephanie ;
Badlani, Sameer ;
Melton, Genevieve B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (08) :1326-1330
[3]  
[Anonymous], R PROJECT STAT COMPU
[4]  
[Anonymous], American Community Survey Accessed August 23, 2023
[5]   Who Isn't Using Patient Portals And Why? Evidence And Implications From A National Sample Of US Adults [J].
Anthony, Denise L. ;
Campos-Castillo, Celeste ;
Lim, Paulina S. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (12) :1948-1954
[6]   Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) :3661-3679
[7]   Opportunities and Challenges for Biosensors and Nanoscale Analytical Tools for Pandemics: COVID-19 [J].
Bhalla, Nikhil ;
Pan, Yuwei ;
Yang, Zhugen ;
Payam, Amir Farokh .
ACS NANO, 2020, 14 (07) :7783-7807
[8]   Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series [J].
Bhatraju, Pavan K. ;
Ghassemieh, Bijan J. ;
Nichols, Michelle ;
Kim, Richard ;
Jerome, Keith R. ;
Nalla, Arun K. ;
Greninger, Alexander L. ;
Pipavath, Sudhakar ;
Wurfel, Mark M. ;
Evans, Laura ;
Kritek, Patricia A. ;
West, T. Eoin ;
Luks, Andrew ;
Gerbino, Anthony ;
Dale, Chris R. ;
Goldman, Jason D. ;
O'Mahony, Shane ;
Mikacenic, Carmen .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (21) :2012-2022
[9]  
Biswas M, 2021, INTERVIROLOGY, V64, P36, DOI [10.29322/ijsrp.29.12.2019, 10.1159/000512592]
[10]   Severe COVID-19 Infections-Knowledge Gained and Remaining Questions [J].
Bos, Lieuwe D. J. ;
Brodie, Daniel ;
Calfee, Carolyn S. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (01) :9-11