The research-practice nexus in doctoral education: the voices of social and health sciences PhD candidates and graduates

被引:6
作者
Alves, Patricia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lopes, Amelia [1 ,4 ]
Menezes, Isabel [1 ,4 ]
Kowalczuk-Waledziak, Marta [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Ctr Res & Intervent Educ CIIE, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, CINTESIS, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Educ Sci, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Bialystok, Fac Educ, Int Cooperat, Bialystok, Poland
[6] Daugavpils Univ, Fac Educ & Management, Inst Humanities & Social Sci, Ctr Sustainable Educ, Daugavpils, Latvia
关键词
Doctoral education; professional practice; PhD degree; social and health sciences; research-practice nexus; impact of PhD on practice; PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE; IMPACT; KNOWLEDGE; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1080/13596748.2021.1920260
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The recent shift towards more practice-oriented doctoral training programmes relevant for non-academic settings raises the important, but still largely unexplored, question regarding how the relationships between research and professional practice are understood, experienced, and developed in contemporary doctoral education. Drawing on a mixed-methods study, combining a survey (n = 188) and individual interviews (n = 14), this paper explores the nature of the research-practice nexus in doctoral education from the perspective of PhD candidates and graduates with different professional backgrounds in social and health sciences in Poland and Portugal. Overall, the study findings suggest that this nexus is viewed as a dynamic, multidimensional relationship imbued with both connections and tensions. While the majority of the participants reported that their doctoral research influenced their professional practice positively and vice versa, there were also some respondents who identified negative impacts of their research on their practice and vice versa. The paper ends with some implications, thus providing a basis for reappraisal of current doctoral education provision in terms of deepening the relationship between research and professional practice.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 311
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OECD Review of Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Portugal, DOI [10.1787/9789264308138-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264308138-EN]
[2]   The design of doctorate curricula for practising professionals [J].
Armsby, Pauline ;
Costley, Carol ;
Cranfield, Steven .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (12) :2226-2237
[4]   From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China [J].
Bao, Yanhua ;
Kehm, Barbara M. ;
Ma, Yonghong .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (03) :524-541
[5]  
Bogle D., 2010, Doctoral degrees Beyond 2010: Training talented researchers for society
[6]  
Borrell-Damian L., 2015, Collaborative doctoral education in Europe: Research partnerships and employability for researchers
[7]   The influence of professional doctorates on practice and the workplace [J].
Boud, David ;
Fillery-Travis, Annette ;
Pizzolato, Nico ;
Sutton, Brian .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (05) :914-926
[8]  
Boyd P., 2013, INITIAL ED TEACHERS, P135
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[10]   Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value [J].
Bryan, Billy ;
Guccione, Kay .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (06) :1124-1140