Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method:: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? -: art. no. W02011

被引:173
作者
Michel, C [1 ]
Andréassian, V [1 ]
Perrin, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Water Qual & Hydrol Res Unit, F-92163 Antony, France
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2004WR003191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper unveils major inconsistencies in the age-old and yet efficient Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) procedure. Our findings are based on an analysis of the continuous soil moisture accounting procedure implied by the SCS-CN equation. It is shown that several flaws plague the original SCS-CN procedure, the most important one being a confusion between intrinsic parameter and initial condition. A change of parameterization and a more complete assessment of the initial condition lead to a renewed SCS-CN procedure, while keeping the acknowledged efficiency of the original method.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ASCE, 1996, Hydrology Handbook
[2]   Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve-number technique [J].
Choi, JY ;
Engel, BA ;
Chung, HW .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (16) :3131-3150
[3]  
Chow T.V., 1988, APPL HYDROLOGY
[4]  
De Michele C, 2002, J HYDROL, V262, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00025-2
[5]  
Edijatno, 1999, HYDROLOG SCI J, V44, P263, DOI 10.1080/02626669909492221
[6]  
HAWKINS RH, 1978, J IRR DRAIN DIV-ASCE, V104, P389
[7]   Long-term hydrological simulation based on the Soil Conservation Service curve number [J].
Mishra, SK ;
Singh, VP .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (07) :1291-1313
[8]  
Mishra SK, 1999, HYDROL PROCESS, V13, P1691, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990815)13:11&lt
[9]  
1691::AID-HYP818&gt
[10]  
3.0.CO