Machine learning based hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure in friction stir welding

被引:47
作者
Du, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Mukherjee, T. [1 ]
Mitra, P. [3 ]
DebRoy, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Tianjin Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Tianjin Key Lab Adv Joining Technol, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Penn State Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Friction stir welding; Aluminum alloys; Tool failure; Machine learning; Neural network; Decision tree; MATERIAL FLOW; TRAVERSE FORCE; ALUMINUM-ALLOY; 3-DIMENSIONAL HEAT; PLASTIC-FLOW; TORQUE; TEMPERATURE; SIMULATION; PARAMETERS; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.047
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Since friction stir welding tools fail in service under various mechanisms, it is difficult to mitigate tool failure based on mechanistic understanding alone. Here we use multiple machine learning algorithms and a mechanistic model to identify the causative variables responsible for tool failure. We analyze one hundred and fourteen sets of experimental data for three commonly used alloys to evaluate the hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure. Three decision tree based algorithms are used to rank the hierarchy of the relative influence of six important friction stir welding variables on tool failure. The maximum shear stress is found to be the most important causative variable for tool failure. This is consistent with the effect of shear stress on the load experienced by the tool. The second most important factor is the flow stress which affects the plasticized material flow around the tool pin. All other variables are found to be significantly less important. Three algorithms also generate identical results and predict tool failure with the highest accuracy of 98%. A combination of mechanistic model, machine learning and experimental data can prevent tool failure accurately. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Transport Phenomena, DOI [DOI 10.1002/AIC.690070245, DOI 10.1115/1.1424298]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Machine Learning
[3]   Load bearing capacity of tool pin during friction stir welding [J].
Arora, A. ;
Mehta, M. ;
De, A. ;
DebRoy, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 61 (9-12) :911-920
[4]   Back-of-the-envelope calculations in friction stir welding - Velocities, peak temperature, torque, and hardness [J].
Arora, A. ;
DebRoy, T. ;
Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2011, 59 (05) :2020-2028
[5]   Strains and strain rates during friction stir welding [J].
Arora, A. ;
Zhang, Z. ;
De, A. ;
DebRoy, T. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2009, 61 (09) :863-866
[6]   Torque, power requirement and stir zone geometry in friction stir welding through modeling and experiments [J].
Arora, A. ;
Nandan, R. ;
Reynolds, A. P. ;
DebRoy, T. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2009, 60 (01) :13-16
[7]   Neural networks in materials science [J].
Bhadeshia, HKDH .
ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 39 (10) :966-979
[8]   Probing torque, traverse force and tool durability in friction stir welding of aluminum alloys [J].
Buchibabu, V. ;
Reddy, G. M. ;
De, A. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 241 :86-92
[9]   3-Dimensional CFD modelling of flow round a threaded friction stir welding tool profile [J].
Colegrove, PA ;
Shercliff, HR .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 169 (02) :320-327
[10]  
Collier C., 2015, THESIS, DOI 10.18297/etd/2204