Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis

被引:183
作者
Schreck, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Prod Management & Managerial Accounting, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
business case; corporate social responsibility; corporate social performance; CSP/CFP link; empirical; causality; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; INVESTOR PROTECTION; RISK; LEGITIMACY; IMPACT; EQUILIBRIUM; CITIZENSHIP; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study complements previous empirical research on the business case for corporate social responsibility (CSR) by employing hitherto unused data on corporate social performance (CSP) and proposing statistical analyses to account for bi-directional causality between social and financial performance. By allowing for differences in the importance of single components of CSP between industries, the data in this study overcome certain limitations of the databases used in earlier studies. The econometrics employed offer a rigorous way of addressing the problem of endogeneity due to simultaneous causality. Although the study's results provide no evidence that there is a generic or universal business case for CSR, they indicate that there is a strong link between single stakeholder-related issues of CSR and financial performance. However, the analysis does not establish causality within these relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 188
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (01) :1-27
[2]   Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations [J].
Albinger, HS ;
Freeman, SJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2000, 28 (03) :243-253
[3]   Customer satisfaction and shareholder value [J].
Anderson, EW ;
Fornell, C ;
Mazvancheryl, SK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2004, 68 (04) :172-185
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ETHISCHE KRITERIEN B
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Interaction effects in multiple regression
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause
[7]  
[Anonymous], ENV SOC GOV RAT CRIT
[8]   Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment [J].
Bansal, P ;
Clelland, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (01) :93-103
[9]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[10]   Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Salomon, Robert M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122