Some animals are more equal than others: Validation of a new scale to measure how attitudes to animals depend on species and human purpose of use

被引:26
作者
Bradley, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Mennie, Neil [3 ]
Bibby, Peter A. [1 ]
Cassaday, Helen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Educ & Sociol, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Malaysia Campus, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
SEX-ROLE INVENTORY; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; PET OWNERSHIP; PERSONALITY; WELFARE; STUDENTS; SCIENCE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0227948
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Globally, many millions of animals are used by humans every year and much of this usage causes public concern. A new scale, devised to measure attitudes to animal use in relation to the purpose of use and species, the Animal Purpose Questionnaire (APQ), was completed by in total 483 participants, 415 British nationals and 68 participants from 39 other countries. The APQ was presented in two survey formats, alongside an established Animal Attitudes Scale (AAS). In both surveys, participants also provided demographic details to provide a context to their attitudes to animals. As might be expected, and consistent with the validity of the new scale, overall scores on the AAS and APQ were highly correlated. However, the APQ provided a more differentiated measure of attitudes to animal use across a variety of settings. The results showed that there was overall higher levels of agreement with the use of animals in medical research and basic science, less endorsement for food production and pest control, and the use of animals for other cultural practices was generally disapproved of, irrespective of species. Participants overall disagreed with the use of rabbits, monkeys, badgers, tree shrews (survey 1), chimpanzees, dogs, dolphins and parrots (survey 2), but were neutral about the use of rats, mice, pigs, octopus, chickens, zebrafish (survey 1), carp, chickens, pigs, pigeons, rabbits and rats (survey 2). Interactions between species and purpose were largely driven by the consideration of using diverse species for food production. In general, females and vegetarians expressed less agreement with the use of animals with some differences by purpose of use. Pet keeping consistently predicted reduced willingness to use animals for basic science (only). The APQ provides a new tool to unpack how public attitudes depend on the intersectionality of demographics, species and purpose of use.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Bem Sex Role Inventory Validation in the International Mobility in Aging Study [J].
Ahmed, Tamer ;
Vafaei, Afshin ;
Belanger, Emmanuelle ;
Phillips, Susan P. ;
Zunzunegui, Maria-Victoria .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2016, 35 (03) :348-360
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOC ANIMALS, DOI DOI 10.1163/156853095X00125
[3]   Bullfighting and the War on Terror: Debates on culture and torture in Spain, 2004-11 [J].
Beilin, Katarzyna Olga .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES, 2012, 25 (01) :61-72
[4]   THE BSRI AND GENDER SCHEMA THEORY - REPLY [J].
BEM, SL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1981, 88 (04) :369-371
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (02) :155-162
[6]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[7]  
Broida John., 1993, SOC ANIMALS, V1, P129, DOI DOI 10.1163/156853093X00037
[8]   Changing Attitudes about the Weak: Social and Legal Conditions for Animal Protection in China [J].
Carpenter, Alisha F. ;
Song, Wei .
CRITICAL ASIAN STUDIES, 2016, 48 (03) :380-399
[9]   The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of Speciesism [J].
Caviola, Lucius ;
Everett, Jim A. C. ;
Faber, Nadira S. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 116 (06) :1011-1029
[10]  
Clemence M., 2016, Public Attitudes to Animal Research in 2016