The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive

被引:90
作者
Barditch-Crovo, P
Trapnell, CB
Ette, E
Zacur, HA
Coresh, J
Rocco, LE
Hendrix, CW
Flexner, C
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Hyg & Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] US FDA, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70138-4
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Rifampin (INN, rifampicin), a CYP34A inducer, results in significant interactions when coadministered with combination oral contraceptives that contain norethindrone (INN, norethisterone) and ethinyl estradiol (INN, ethinylestradiol), Little is known about the effects of rifabutin, a related rifamycin. Objectives and Methods: The relative effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover study in 12 premenopausal women who were on a stable oral contraceptive regimen that contained 35 mu g ethinyl estradiol/l mg norethindrone, Subjects were randomized to receive 14 days of rifampin or rifabutin from days 7 through 21 of their menstrual cycle. After a 1-month washout period (only the oral contraceptives were taken), subjects were crossed over to the other rifamycin, Results: Rifampin significantly decreased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours [AUC(0-24)] of ethinyl estradiol and the mean AUC(0-24) of norethindrone, Rifabutin significantly decreased the mean AUC(0-24) of ethinyl estradiol and the mean AUC(0-24) of norethindrone. The effect of rifampin was significantly greater than rifabutin on each AUC(0-24), Despite these changes, subjects did not ovulate (as determined by progesterone concentrations) during the cycle in which either rifamycin was administered, Levels of mean follicle-stimulating hormone increased 69% after rifampin. Conclusion: In this study, rifampin (600 mg daily) was a more significant inducer of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone clearance than rifabutin (300 mg daily), but neither agent reversed the suppression of ovulation caused by oral contraceptives. The carefully monitored oral contraceptive administration and the limited exposure to rifamycins may restrict the application of this study to clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 438
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] ALTSCHULER SL, 1974, OBSTET GYNECOL, V44, P771
  • [2] Severe neutropenia caused by recommended prophylactic doses of rifabutin
    Apseloff, G
    Foulds, G
    LaBoyGoral, L
    Kraut, E
    Vincent, J
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 348 (9028) : 685 - 685
  • [3] RIFAMPIN DRUG-INTERACTIONS
    BACIEWICZ, AM
    SELF, TH
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 144 (08) : 1667 - 1671
  • [4] EFFECT OF RIFAMPICIN ON NORETHISTERONE PHARMACOKINETICS
    BACK, DJ
    BRECKENRIDGE, AM
    CRAWFORD, F
    MACIVER, M
    ORME, ML
    PARK, BK
    ROWE, PH
    SMITH, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1979, 15 (03) : 193 - 197
  • [5] EFFECT OF RIFAMPICIN ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF ETHYNYLESTRADIOL IN WOMEN
    BACK, DJ
    BRECKENRIDGE, AM
    CRAWFORD, FE
    HALL, JM
    MACIVER, M
    ORME, MLE
    ROWE, PH
    SMITH, E
    WATTS, MJ
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1980, 21 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [6] PHARMACOKINETIC DRUG-INTERACTIONS WITH ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES
    BACK, DJ
    ORME, MLE
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1990, 18 (06) : 472 - 484
  • [7] BACK DJ, 1984, NERVOUS SYSTEM ENDOC, V2, P305
  • [8] BARTLETT JG, 1997, MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNI, P79
  • [9] Inducing properties of rifabutin, and effects on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of concomitant drugs
    Benedetti, MS
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) : 177 - 187
  • [10] RANGING HORMONES - DO HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVES IGNORE HUMAN BIOLOGICAL VARIATION AND EVOLUTION
    BENTLEY, GR
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY: INTERACTIONS OF ENVIRONMENT, FERTILITY, AND BEHAVIOR, 1994, 709 : 201 - 203