Stopping menopausal hormone therapy: If breast cancer really decreased, why did colorectal cancer not increase?

被引:2
|
作者
Nahum, Gerard G. [2 ]
Stanislaw, Harold [1 ]
Simon, James A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Stanislaus, Dept Psychol, Turlock, CA 95382 USA
[2] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceut, Global Clin Dev, Primary Care & Womens Healthcare, Montville, NJ USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC USA
[4] Womens Hlth & Res Consultants, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Menopause; Hormone therapy; Estrogen therapy; Combined estrogen plus progestogen therapy; Colorectal cancer; Invasive breast cancer; Postmenopausal status; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ESTROGEN PLUS PROGESTIN; HEALTHY POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; CONJUGATED EQUINE ESTROGENS; RELATIVE RISK; INITIAL PUBLICATION; COMMON OUTCOMES; UNITED-STATES; ODDS RATIO; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.01.002
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) found that estrogen plus progestogen therapy (EPT) decreased colorectal cancer risk. Thus, the decline in EPT use from 2002 to 2003 should have precipitated an increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer. We tested this prediction using the SEER 9 epidemiologic database. Methods: We analyzed WHI data concerning the effects of EPT and estrogen therapy (ET) on colorectal cancer risks. We also examined HT prescription sales data, as well as SEER 9 colorectal cancer incidences from 2001 to 2004. Results: In the WHI study, the incidence of colorectal cancer was comparable in EFT placebo-users, ET users, and ET placebo-users, but significantly lower in EPT users. Assuming that 30% of eligible women used HT in 2001, the decline in EPT sales from 2002 to 2003 of 63% should have increased the incidence of colorectal cancer by 2.8% in the overall population at risk. However, the SEER 9 colorectal cancer incidence fell by 5.9% in this population, which is comparable to the 6.7% decrease observed for invasive breast cancer from 2002 to 2003. Conclusions: Declining EPT use from 2002 to 2003 should have precipitated an increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer, but the opposite trend was seen in the SEER 9 database during this time. The incidences of invasive breast cancer and colorectal cancer both declined by a similar amount from 2002 to 2003, despite the results of the WHI study predicting opposing trends for the two different types of cancer. Thus, the SEER 9 findings are fundamentally incompatible with expectations from the WHI findings. This implies that reductions in HT use from 2002 to 2003 cannot account for the contemporaneous changes in invasive breast cancer and colorectal cancer incidences. Alternative explanations must be found. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 359
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Menopausal Hormone Therapy Formulation and Breast Cancer Risk
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Suissa, Samy
    Azoulay, Laurent
    Spence, Andrea R.
    Czuzoj-Shulman, Nicholas
    Tulandi, Togas
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (06) : 1103 - 1110
  • [22] Menopausal hormone therapy use in relation to breast cancer incidence in 11 European countries
    Antoine, Caroline
    Ameye, Lieveke
    Paesmans, Marianne
    de Azambuja, Evandro
    Rozenberg, Serge
    MATURITAS, 2016, 84 : 81 - 88
  • [23] Menopausal hormone therapy in the cancer survivors
    Ahn, Hyo Leong
    Hwang, Kyu Ri
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 62 (03): : 160 - 166
  • [24] Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Phenotype: Does Dose Matter?
    Elisabeth R. Garwood
    Anjali S. Kumar
    Veronica Shim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 2526 - 2532
  • [25] Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer phenotype: Does dose matter?
    Garwood, Elisabeth R.
    Kumar, Anjali S.
    Shim, Veronica
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (09) : 2526 - 2532
  • [26] Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: All progestogens are not the same
    Lambrinoudaki, Irene
    CASE REPORTS IN WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 29
  • [27] Menopausal hormone therapy and cancer risk: An overestimated risk?
    Simin, Johanna
    Tamimi, Rulla
    Lagergren, Jesper
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Brusselaers, Nele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 84 : 60 - 68
  • [29] Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: impact of different treatments. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
    Bakken, Kjersti
    Fournier, Agnes
    Lund, Eiliv
    Waaseth, Marit
    Dumeaux, Vanessa
    Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
    Fabre, Alban
    Hemon, Bertrand
    Rinaldi, Sabina
    Chajes, Veronique
    Slimani, Nadia
    Allen, Naomi E.
    Reeves, Gillian K.
    Bingham, Sheila
    Khaw, Kay-Tee
    Olsen, Anja
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Rodriguez, Laudina
    Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    Amiano Etxezarreta, Pilar
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Tormo, Maria-Jose
    Peeters, Petra H.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Steffen, Annika
    Schulz, Mandy
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    Tumino, Rosario
    Gallo, Valentina
    Norat, Teresa
    Riboli, Elio
    Panico, Salvatore
    Masala, Giovanna
    Gonzalez, Carlos A.
    Berrino, Franco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 128 (01) : 144 - 156
  • [30] Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer mortality: clinical implications
    Chlebowski, Rowan T.
    Anderson, Garnet L.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 6 (02) : 45 - 56