Escape from the diffusion of responsibility: A review and guide for nurses

被引:16
作者
Christensen, Scott S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah Hlth, Nursing Adm, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
diffusion of responsibility; ethics; groupthink; nursing; obedience; social conformity; INTERVENTION; GROUPTHINK;
D O I
10.1111/jonm.12677
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
AimsThis review aims to help nurse leaders and professionals to understand, recognize, and mitigate the phenomenon known as the diffusion of responsibility, while also bridging a gap in nursing literature by highlighting Milgram's and Zimbardo's research. BackgroundNurses are uninformed of how responsibility is diffused when obeying authority figures, fulfilling roles, and conforming in groups. It is important to recognize and address this potential for unethical practices, given the high risk for these behaviours to occur in health care settings. EvaluationSources discussing the diffusion of responsibility were identified through databases using terms such as: Diffusion of Responsibility, Nursing, Ethics, Obedience, Groupthink, Bully, Milgram, and Zimbardo. Key IssuesSocial psychology examples of diffused responsibility from Milgram, Zimbardo, and Janis are explored, applied to the field of nursing, and leadership implications are discussed. ConclusionNurses can unintentionally ascribe accountability for personal action to others. It is therefore essential for nurses to escape the cycle of diffused responsibility. Implications for Nursing ManagementExamples in this review provide important clues for addressing the negative effects of diffused responsibility. The onus is on nurses to personally enhance the ethics of their practice by surveying, pondering, and applying these concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 270
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
Macleod Les, 2011, Nurs Manage, V42, P44, DOI 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000394953.94337.b4
[22]   Systematic biases in group decision-making: implications for patient safety [J].
Mannion, Russell ;
Thompson, Carl .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (06) :606-612
[23]   BEHAVIORAL-STUDY OF OBEDIENCE [J].
MILGRAM, S .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (04) :371-378
[24]   The Stanford Prison Experiment: Implications for the Care of the "Difficult" Patient [J].
Onishi, So L. ;
Hebert, Randy S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (01) :64-68
[25]   Are theoretical perspectives useful to explain nurses' tolerance of suboptimal care? [J].
Price, Lesley ;
Duffy, Kathleen ;
McCallum, Jacqueline ;
Ness, Valerie .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2015, 23 (07) :940-944
[26]  
Recuber Timothy., 2016, Research Ethics, V12, P44, DOI [10.1177/1747016115579533, DOI 10.1177/1747016115579533]
[27]  
ROSENBLUM EH, 1982, J NURS ADMIN, V12, P27
[28]  
Starck P. L., 2014, HUMAN SUBJECTS RES H, P195
[29]   When managers pressure employees to behave badly: Toward a comprehensive response [J].
Tepper, Bennett J. .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2010, 53 (06) :591-598
[30]  
Tolich M., 2014, RES ETHICS-UK, V1082, P96, DOI [10.1177/1747016114523771, DOI 10.1177/1747016114523771]