A Stabilized Finite Element Formulation for Continuum Models of Traffic Flow

被引:0
作者
Vikram, Durgesh [1 ]
Mittal, Sanjay [2 ]
Chakroborty, Partha [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES | 2011年 / 79卷 / 3-4期
关键词
Traffic flow; Finite element method; (IEPG) Inter-Equation/Petrov-Galerkin stabilization; SUPG; Shock wave; Expansion wave; DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATION; COMPUTATION; WAVES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A stabilized finite element formulation is presented to solve the governing equations for traffic flow. The flow is assumed to be one-dimensional. Both, PW-type (Payne-Whitham) 2-equation models and the LWR-type (Lighthill-Whitham-Richards) 1-equation models are considered. The SUPG (Streamline-Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin) and shock capturing stabilizations are utilized. These stabilizations are sufficient for the 1-equation models. However, an additional stabilization is necessary for the 2-equation models. For the first time, such a stabilization is proposed. It arises from the coupling between the two equations and is termed as IEPG (Inter-Equation/Petrov-Galerkin) stabilization. Two behavioral models are studied: Greenshields' (GS) and Greenberg's (GB) models. Numerical tests are carried out for cases involving traffic expansion as well as shock. Excellent agreement with the exact solution is observed. The need of the IEPG stabilization for the 2-equation traffic models is demonstrated. An interesting observation is made for the first time regarding the Greenberg's (GB) model in the presence of a shock. The model is found to be inconsistent in the sense that it leads to different shock speed from the continuity and behavior equations. As a result, the 2-equation model leads to secondary waves in the presence of shocks.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 259
页数:23
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00005-X
[2]  
Beau G.J.L., 1991, ADV FINITE ELEMENT A, V123, P21
[3]   STREAMLINE UPWIND PETROV-GALERKIN FORMULATIONS FOR CONVECTION DOMINATED FLOWS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS [J].
BROOKS, AN ;
HUGHES, TJR .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1982, 32 (1-3) :199-259
[4]   A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow [J].
Daganzo, CF .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1995, 29 (04) :261-276
[5]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC FLOW [J].
GREENBERG, H .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1959, 7 (01) :79-85
[6]   A new continuum model for traffic flow and numerical tests [J].
Jiang, R ;
Wu, QS ;
Zhu, ZJ .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2002, 36 (05) :405-419
[7]   Multiscale-stabilized solutions to one-dimensional systems of conservation laws [J].
Juanes, R ;
Patzek, TW .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 194 (25-26) :2781-2805
[8]   NUMERICAL-SIMULATION OF MACROSCOPIC CONTINUUM TRAFFIC MODELS [J].
LEO, CJ ;
PRETTY, RL .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1992, 26 (03) :207-220
[9]  
Lighthill J.M., 1955, Proceedings of the royal society of london. series a. mathematical and physical sciences, V229, P317, DOI [10.1098/rspa.1955.0089, DOI 10.1098/RSPA.1955.0089]
[10]  
Liu CS, 2006, CMES-COMP MODEL ENG, V12, P197