Tensioning device increases coracoid bone block healing rates in arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with suture-button fixation

被引:20
作者
Boileau, Pascal [1 ]
Gendre, Patrick [2 ]
Saliken, David J. [3 ]
Thelu, Charles-Edouard [4 ]
Trojani, Christophe [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Sports & Reconstruct Surg, Inst Chirurg Reparatrice ICR Grp KANTYS, 7 Av Durante, F-06004 Nice, France
[2] Pole Antibes St Jean, Antibes, France
[3] Rebalance MD, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] Nord Epaule, Lille, France
关键词
Arthroscopic Latarjet; cortical-button; suture-button; suture tensioner; coracoid fixation; bone block healing; CT scan assessment; RECURRENT ANTERIOR DISLOCATION; SHORT-TERM COMPLICATIONS; BANKART REPAIR; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; BRISTOW PROCEDURE; SCREW FIXATION; MULTICENTER; STABILITY; OUTCOMES; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.126
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is growing interest in using suture buttons for coracoid fixation to avoid the complications associated with screws during the Latarjet procedure. However, achieving bone block healing is critical for successful shoulder stabilization and return to sport. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the healing rates and positioning of the coracoid bone block fixed with cortical suture buttons that were either manually tensioned (using a knot pusher) or mechanically tensioned (using a tensioning device) during arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study enrolled 69 consecutive patients (mean age, 27 years) who underwent an arthroscopic guided Latarjet procedure with suture-button fixation. Hand tensioning was performed in the first 34 shoulders, whereas the next 35 shoulders underwent mechanical tensioning. Twelve patients (17%) had a history of failed Bankart stabilization. The characteristics of the patients in each group in terms of age, sex, type of sport, bone loss, number of previous failed surgical procedures, smoking, and length of follow-up were comparable. Intraoperatively, the tensioning device was set at 100 N successively 3 times until complete immobilization of the bone block was confirmed, as assessed with a probe. The primary outcome measure was coracoid bone block union and position on computed tomography scan images at 6 months' follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included functional outcome scores, shoulder stability, return to sports, and complications at last follow-up. Results: Overall, the rate of bone block healing was 74% (25 of 34 patients) in the hand-tensioning group and 94% (33 of 35 patients) in the mechanical tensioning group (P = .043). Smoking was an independent risk factor associated with nonunion (P < .001) in each group. Patient age, size of the preoperative glenoid bone defect (<20% or >20%), and a history of surgery were not found to have any influence. The tensioning modality did not affect the bone block position, which was subequatorial in 92% of the cases and flush with the glenoid rim in 92%. At a mean of 34 months of follow-up (range, 24-62 months), 96% of the patients (65 of 69) had a stable shoulder and 87% returned to sports. At final follow-up, no significant difference in clinical scores was noted between the groups; no neurologic or hardware complications were observed. Conclusion: Mechanical tensioning achieves significantly higher healing rates than hand tensioning during the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with suture-button fixation. The use of a suture-tensioning device is a key step to the suture-button fixation technique during arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. By making the suture-button construct rigid, the tensioning device transforms the initially flexible suture into a "rigid fixation", similar to a bolt (or a rivet). (C) 2022 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1462
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder [J].
Allain, J ;
Goutallier, D ;
Glorion, C .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (06) :841-852
[2]   Latarjet Fixation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cortical and Cannulated Screw Fixation [J].
Alvi, Hasham M. ;
Monroe, Emily J. ;
Muriuki, Muturi ;
Verma, Rajat N. ;
Marra, Guido ;
Saltzman, Matthew D. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (04)
[3]   Short-term Complications of the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: A North American Experience [J].
Athwal, George S. ;
Meislin, Robert ;
Getz, Charles ;
Weinstein, David ;
Favorito, Paul .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (10) :1965-1970
[4]   Mechanical behavior of screw versus Endobutton for coracoid bone-block fixation [J].
Azoulay, Vadim ;
Briot, Jerome ;
Mansat, Pierre ;
Swider, Pascal ;
Bonnevialle, Nicolas .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (06) :1089-1093
[5]  
Bain GI, 2000, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V9, P120
[6]   The instability severity index score [J].
Balg, F. ;
Boileau, P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (11) :1470-1477
[7]   Can Optimizing the Mechanical Environment Deliver a Clinically Significant Reduction in Fracture Healing Time? [J].
Barcik, Jan ;
Epari, Devakara R. .
BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (06)
[8]   Arthroscopic Latarjet: 2 or 4 Cortical Buttons for Coracoid Fixation? A Case-Control Comparative Study [J].
Barret, Hugo ;
Chelli, Mikael ;
Van der Meijden, Olivier ;
Langlais, Tristan ;
Boileau, Pascal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (02) :311-320
[9]   Coracoid bone block versus arthroscopic Bankart repair: A comparative paired study with 5-year follow-up [J].
Bessiere, C. ;
Trojani, C. ;
Pelegri, C. ;
Carles, M. ;
Boileau, P. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (02) :123-130
[10]   Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic bankart repair [J].
Boileau, Pascal ;
Villalba, Matias ;
Hery, Jean-Yves ;
Balg, Frederic ;
Ahrens, Philip ;
Neyton, Lionel .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (08) :1755-1763