CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of immediate implants placed using undersized drilling

被引:25
作者
Gonzalez-Martin, Oscar [1 ]
Lee, Ernesto A. [1 ]
Veltri, Mario [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Postdoctoral Periodontal Prosthesis Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Oral Surg, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
compression necrosis; cone beam CT; fractal analysis; immediate implant; surgical technique; INSERTION TORQUE; BONE-DENSITY; PROVISIONALIZATION; INTERVENTION; MICROMOTION; MARROW;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02246.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate, on the base of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) fractal dimension, bone quality changes surrounding the apical portion of immediate implants placed under higher insertion torque utilizing an undersized drilling technique. Materials and methods: Three patients were enrolled in this study. Single implants were placed into fresh extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla and provisionalized immediately. Adequate stability was ensured on all the implants by a 28.5% undersizing of the apical portion of the osteotomy. Bone quality at the most apical 1.15 mm peri-implant bone portion were measured by CBCT at placement and after 6 months. This analysis was carried out by evaluating the box counting fractal dimension of 15 consecutive CBCT slices related to the most apical part of each implant. Results: All the three implants were successful after an 18-month follow-up period. The mean fractal dimension at the implant apex exhibited a 3% increase 6 months following placement. Conclusions: Within the limitations of an explorative study, an undersized drilling resulting in high insertion torque would seem to induce no adverse changes in radiographic bone quality after 6 months of follow-up. The most favorable entity of drilling undersizing and its effect on peri-implant bone remodeling, should be evaluated on a larger patient population. To cite this article:?Gonzalez-Martin O, Lee EA, Veltri M. CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of immediate implants placed using undersized drilling?Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 954957?doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02246.x
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 957
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   SIGNIFICANCE OF INTRAMEDULLARY CANCELLOUS BONE FORMATION IN REPAIR OF BONE MARROW TISSUE [J].
AMSEL, S ;
MANIATIS, A ;
TAVASSOLI, M ;
CROSBY, WH .
ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1969, 164 (01) :101-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   Implant Compression Necrosis: Current Understanding and Case Report [J].
Bashutski, Jill D. ;
D'Silva, Nisha J. ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (04) :700-704
[4]  
BRANEMAR.PI, 1964, ACTA ANAT, V59, P1
[5]  
Cannizzaro G, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P87
[6]   Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome [J].
De Rouck, Tim ;
Collys, Kristiaan ;
Wyn, Iris ;
Cosyn, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (06) :566-570
[7]   Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging [J].
Hua, Yan ;
Nackaerts, Olivia ;
Duyck, Joke ;
Maes, Frederik ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (08) :767-771
[8]   Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs [J].
Jolley, L. ;
Majumdar, S. ;
Kapila, S. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (06) :393-397
[9]  
Kan JYK, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P31
[10]  
Lee EA, 2009, PRACT PROCED AESTHET, V21, P207