What is the employment potential of a lean platform? The case of Dutch self-employed service professionals

被引:6
作者
Jonker-Hoffren, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Work Res Ctr, Tampere, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Self-employment; Digital economy; Service professionals; Employment; Two-sided labour market; WORK;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-01-2019-0037
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this article is to study what platform-related user factors influence the employment potential of a lean platform for self-employed professionals. Design/methodology/approach The article employs the system data of a Dutch platform firm, which include consumers looking for painters (N = 17,224) and self-employed painters (N = 1,752) who pursue client acquisition by submitting proposals (N = 101,974). This data is analysed using non-parametric tests. Findings Study of this platform shows that the platform functions as a channel of acquisition for self-employed professionals. This lean platform enables matching of information of supply and demand, thereby facilitating processes of acquisition. The number of competitors, distance to a potential job and non-standard proposals are statistically significant factors that influence whether a consumer is interested in a proposal. Effect sizes are very small. Research limitations/implications This platform is a two-way market for information about service jobs, which excludes a price setting mechanism. The findings of this study cannot be generalized to other forms of platforms. Practical implications The market for service professionals is very local; therefore, the platform firm may alter the algorithm to accommodate this. Self-employed professionals should approach using the platform in the same way as normal forms of acquisition. Social implications This particular type of two-sided market is an extension of regular forms of acquisition by creating "weak ties" through the platform. Originality/value The article uses a unique data set to study the impact and limitations of digitalization of the (labour) market for service professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 321
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Agrawal A., 2015, Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy, P219
[2]  
Autor DH, 2013, J LABOUR MARK RES, V46, P185, DOI 10.1007/s12651-013-0128-z
[3]   Wiring the labor market [J].
Autor, DH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (01) :25-40
[4]   A Supply and Demand Framework for Two-Sided Matching Markets [J].
Azevedo, Eduardo M. ;
Leshno, Jacob D. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (05) :1235-1268
[5]  
BALARAM B, 2017, GOOD GIGS
[6]   Reducing vote overreporting in surveys - Social desirability, memory failure, and source monitoring [J].
Belli, RF ;
Traugott, MW ;
Young, M ;
McGonagle, KA .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1999, 63 (01) :90-108
[7]  
BRANCATI CU, 2020, 29958 EUR
[8]   After the crisis? Big Data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology [J].
Burrows, Roger ;
Savage, Mike .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2014, 1 (01)
[9]   CLASSIFYING WORK IN THE NEW ECONOMY [J].
Cappelli, Peter ;
Keller, J. R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (04) :575-596
[10]  
Castells M., 2010, The Rise of the Network Society, the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture