Methodology for integrated multicriteria decision-making with uncertainty: Extending the compromise ranking method for uncertain evaluation of alternatives

被引:18
作者
Juanpera, M. [1 ,2 ]
Domenech, B. [1 ,2 ]
Ferrer-Marti, L. [1 ,3 ]
Garcia-Villoria, A. [1 ,2 ]
Pastor, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, Inst Ind & Control Engn, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, Dept Management, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, Dept Mech Engn, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Multicriteria decision-making; MIMDU methodology; Fuzzy rating scales; Confidence; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; VIKOR METHOD; FUZZY NUMBERS; SCORE FUNCTION; SELECTION; AHP; SUSTAINABILITY; AGGREGATION; EXTENSION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2021.08.008
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Making a decision usually means selecting one from different alternatives to solve a problem according to a set of criteria. Multicriteria analysis usually offers a quantitative approach to ease decision-making by ranking the alternatives. However, uncertainty can arise when rating the importance of criteria and the adequacy of each alternative for each criterion, due to two factors: first, answers are usually expressed in linguistic terms that do not have a unique quantification; and second, there might be a lack of confidence in the response. Most multicriteria procedures combine fuzzy numbers and linguistic scales to deal with the first factor, but underestimate confidence issues. In this context, this work develops a Methodology for Integrated Multicriteria Decision-making with Uncertainty (MIMDU), which considers both factors of uncertainty. MIMDU is structured in three phases: (1) a novel procedure based on fuzzy rating scales to model uncertain opinions; (2) a fuzzy formulation of the compromised ranking method to rank the alternatives; and (3) a systematic procedure for results' interpretation comparing a crisp ranking (without uncertainty) and a fuzzy-based ranking (with uncertainty). The methodology is illustrated with a generic example case, aiming to prove its potential application in any sector. Results show that MIMDU helps decision-makers to choose the most reliable alternative, since significant differences in ranking with and without uncertainty can be addressed. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to bare the effect of confidence in the alternatives evaluation, concluding that worse rankings are obtained for alternatives that are less confidently evaluated. A final comparison with the standard fuzzy VIKOR method shows MIMDU's major preciseness in modelling non-confident opinions and providing more useful and complimentary information to better assist decision-making.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 158
页数:24
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   RETRACTED: An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field (Retracted article. See vol. 139, 2022) [J].
Abdel-Baset, M. ;
Chang, Victor ;
Gamal, Abduallah ;
Smarandache, Florentin .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 106 :94-110
[2]  
Afful-Dadzie E., 2014, COMPUT SCI INF SYST, P183
[3]   Fuzzy adaptive genetic algorithm for multi-objective assembly line balancing problems [J].
Alavidoost, M. H. ;
Tarimoradi, Mosahar ;
Zarandi, M. H. Fazel .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 34 :655-677
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., DOI DOI 10.1142/S0218488594000146
[5]   Hypothesis testing-based comparative analysis between rating scales for intrinsically imprecise data [J].
Asuncion Lubiano, Maria ;
Salas, Antonia ;
Carleos, Carlos ;
de la Rosa de Saa, Sara ;
Angeles Gil, Maria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2017, 88 :128-147
[6]   Descriptive analysis of responses to items in questionnaires. Why not using a fuzzy rating scale? [J].
Asuncion Lubiano, Maria ;
de la Rosa de Saa, Sara ;
Montenegro, Manuel ;
Sinova, Beatriz ;
Angeles Gil, Maria .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 360 :131-148
[7]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[8]   Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Omrani, Hichem ;
Gerber, Philippe .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 116 :247-259
[9]   RATING AND RANKING OF MULTIPLE-ASPECT ALTERNATIVES USING FUZZY SETS [J].
BAAS, SM ;
KWAKERNAAK, H .
AUTOMATICA, 1977, 13 (01) :47-58
[10]   Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward [J].
Baltussen, Rob ;
Marsh, Kevin ;
Thokala, Praveen ;
Diaby, Vakaramoko ;
Castro, Hector ;
Cleemput, Irina ;
Garau, Martina ;
Iskrov, Georgi ;
Olyaeemanesh, Alireza ;
Mirelman, Andrew ;
Mobinizadeh, Mohammedreza ;
Morton, Alec ;
Tringali, Michele ;
van Til, Janine ;
Valentim, Joice ;
Wagner, Monika ;
Youngkong, Sitaporn ;
Zah, Vladimir ;
Toll, Agnes ;
Jansen, Maarten ;
Bijlmakers, Leon ;
Oortwijn, Wija ;
Broekhuizen, Henk .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (11) :1283-1288