DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF CARBON REDUCTION RESEARCH IN CONSTRUCTION

被引:0
作者
Wong, Peter S. P. [1 ]
Imperatori, Francesco [1 ]
Kakavoules, Christian [1 ]
Polastri, Stefan [1 ]
Acquaro, Alessio [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE IDEAS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT | 2015年
关键词
Carbon reduction; Success factors; Construction; Systematic review; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS; SECTOR; BREEAM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry has been proven to be increasingly detrimental to the environment in the past few decades. As environmental awareness expands, efforts to reduce the carbon intensive sector into a sustainable and environmentally friendly industry increase. It is indisputable that the efforts put in place to transform such a sector. Subsequently, the studies associated with carbon reduction development have also funneled into three streams: technology advancement, mechanism establishment and organizational behavior. However, research until now has focused on these streams independently. This paper presents a study that aims to take a holistic approach in analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of previous studies on carbon reduction in construction. A systematic review was conducted and the results came to expose five prevalent and determining factors that catalyze the success and failures of carbon reduction research. The discussion of these factors with their association to technology advancement, mechanism establishment and organizational behavior have uncovered suggestions, that researchers in future can focus on in order to foster carbon reduction within the construction industry. A conceptual framework of carbon reduction research in construction was then developed.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 788
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, EN INF ADM INT EN OU
  • [2] Did that building feel good for you? Or - Isn't it just as important to assess and benchmark users' perceptions of buildings as it is to audit their energy efficiency?
    Baird, George
    [J]. INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 3 (02) : 124 - 130
  • [3] From questions to answers: Reviewing organizational learning research
    Bapuji, H
    Crossan, M
    [J]. MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2004, 35 (04) : 397 - 417
  • [4] Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review
    Klewitz, Johanna
    Hansen, Erik G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 65 : 57 - 75
  • [5] Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects
    Mao, Chao
    Shen, Qipng
    Shen, Liyin
    Tang, Liyaning
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2013, 66 : 165 - 176
  • [6] Mayring P., 2010, Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie
  • [7] Energy efficiency in building installations using thermal insulating materials in northeast Brazil
    Melo, Miguel Otavio B. C.
    da Silva, Luiz Bueno
    Coutinho, Antonio S.
    Sousa, Vivian
    Perazzo, Normando
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 : 35 - 43
  • [8] Pathways to decarbonizing the housing sector: a scenario analysis
    Newton, Peter W.
    Tucker, Selwyn N.
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2011, 39 (01) : 34 - 50
  • [9] Variability of building environmental assessment tools on evaluating carbon emissions
    Ng, S. Thomas
    Chen, Yuan
    Wong, James M. W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 131 - 141
  • [10] Consumer-supplier-government triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector
    Parag, Yael
    Darby, Sarah
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (10) : 3984 - 3992