Impact of single versus multiple policy options on the economic feasibility of biogas energy production: Swine and dairy operations in Nova Scotia

被引:28
作者
Brown, Bettina B.
Yiridoe, Emmanuel K.
Gordon, Robert
机构
[1] Nova Scotia Agr Coll, Dept Business & Social Sci, Agr & Resource Econ Res Grp, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
[2] Nova Scotia Agr Coll, Dept Engn, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
关键词
biogas energy; livestock production; policy schemes;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production was investigated for swine and dairy operations under Nova Scotia, Canada farming conditions, using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period (PP) economic decision criteria. In addition, the effects of selected environmental and "green" energy policy schemes on co-generation of on-farm biogas energy production and other co-benefits from anaerobic digestion of livestock manure were investigated. Cost-efficiencies arising from economies of scale for on-farm anaerobic biogas production were found for swine farms, and less so for dairy production systems. Without incentive schemes, on-farm biogas energy production was not economically feasible across the farm size ranges studied, except for 600- and 800-sow operations. Among single policy schemes investigated, green energy credit policy schemes generated the highest financial returns, compared to cost-share and low-interest loan schemes. Combinations of multiple policies that included cost-share and green energy credit incentive schemes generated the most improvement in financial feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production, for both swine and dairy operations. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4597 / 4610
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT OF ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION SYSTEMS FOR DAIRY WASTE-DISPOSAL AND ENERGY RECOVERY - EFFECT OF SELECTED INSTITUTIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES [J].
ANDERSON, JL .
RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION, 1982, 8 (02) :131-146
[2]  
[Anonymous], CROSS BORDER INDICAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
Barker J.C., 2002, North Carolina Agric. Chem. Man
[5]  
BLANCHARD JP, 1987, METHANE PRODUCTION A
[6]  
BROWN BB, 2006, EC FEASIBILITY BIOGA
[7]  
Burke, 2001, DAIRY WASTE ANAEROBI
[8]  
CICCHETTI CJ, 1978, J BUS ADMIN, V10, P363
[9]   Reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms by psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in swine slurries [J].
Côté, C ;
Massé, DI ;
Quessy, S .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 97 (04) :686-691
[10]  
ENGLER CR, 1999, TEX AN MAN MAN C 199