Topology optimization of coated structure using moving morphable sandwich bars

被引:31
作者
Van-Nam Hoang [1 ]
Ngoc-Linh Nguyen [2 ]
Nguyen-Xuan, H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Maritime Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 484 Lach Tray, Hai Phong, Vietnam
[2] Sejong Univ, Fac Mech & Aerosp Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sejong Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol HUTECH, CIRTECH Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Topology optimization; Coated structure; Composite bar; Moving morphable sandwich bar; Moving morphable bar; GEOMETRY PROJECTION METHOD; MINIMUM LENGTH SCALE; COMPONENTS MMC; DESIGN; SYSTEMS; FILTERS; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-019-02370-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
An explicit topology optimization method for coated structures is proposed by using moving morphable sandwich bars (MMSBs). An MMSB acting as a composite bar has two different material parts with an inner part of the base material and an exterior layer of the coating material. The geometries of an MMSB are mapped onto two different density fields using a fixed grid and the same shortest distance function. The densities of an element are determined depending on whether the element lies inside or outside the boundaries of the inner bars/the hollowed bars. By treating the coordinates of the ends and thicknesses of the base and coating layers of a sandwich bar as design variables, the sandwich bar can move, morph, change its thicknesses, and overlap with others in a fixed design domain to form optimal shapes of the base and coating structures. The minimum thickness of the base structure as well as the coating layer is independently and precisely controlled in an explicit way by simply adjusting the lower bounds of the thickness variables of the sandwich bars. The uniform thickness control of the coating layer can be obtained without any filtering techniques or additional constraints. The proposed method is also extended for topology optimization of the coated structures with two coating layers. The numerical examples of minimizing structural compliance show that the proposed method works effectively and produces good results with smooth and fast convergence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 506
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Thickness control in structural optimization via a level set method
    Allaire, G.
    Jouve, F.
    Michailidis, G.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 53 (06) : 1349 - 1382
  • [2] Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code
    Andreassen, Erik
    Clausen, Anders
    Schevenels, Mattias
    Lazarov, Boyan S.
    Sigmund, Ole
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [3] Bendsoe MP, 1989, Structural Optimization, V1, P193, DOI [10.1007/bf01650949, DOI 10.1007/BF01650949, 10.1007/BF01650949]
  • [4] Filters in topology optimization
    Bourdin, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2001, 50 (09) : 2143 - 2158
  • [5] A polytree-based adaptive polygonal finite element method for multi-material topology optimization
    Chau, Khai N.
    Chau, Khanh N.
    Tuan Ngo
    Hackl, Klaus
    Nguyen-Xuan, H.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 332 : 712 - 739
  • [6] Shape feature control in structural topology optimization
    Chen, Shikui
    Wang, Michael Yu
    Liu, Ai Qun
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2008, 40 (09) : 951 - 962
  • [7] Exploiting Additive Manufacturing Infill in Topology Optimization for Improved Buckling Load
    Clausen, Anders
    Aage, Niels
    Sigmund, Ole
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2016, 2 (02) : 250 - 257
  • [8] Topology optimization of coated structures and material interface problems
    Clausen, Anders
    Aage, Niels
    Sigmund, Ole
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 290 : 524 - 541
  • [9] CHECKERBOARD PATTERNS IN LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION
    Diaz, A
    Sigmund, O
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1995, 10 (01): : 40 - 45
  • [10] Imposing maximum length scale in topology optimization
    Guest, James K.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 37 (05) : 463 - 473