A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA

被引:214
|
作者
Mukherjee, C. [1 ]
Denney, J. [1 ]
Mbonimpa, E. G. [1 ]
Slagley, J. [1 ]
Bhowmik, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Inst Technol, Dept Syst Engn & Management, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Polaron Analyt, 4031 Colonel Glenn Highway, Beavercreek, OH 45431 USA
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2020年 / 119卷
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Waste-to-energy; Thermal treatment; Non-thermal treatment; Gasification; Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MICROWAVE-ASSISTED PYROLYSIS; LANDFILL LEACHATE TREATMENT; GASIFICATION COMBINED-CYCLE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CATALYTIC FAST PYROLYSIS; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ORGANIC FRACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109512
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This review on current US municipal solid waste-to-energy trends highlighted regional contrasts on technology adoption, unique challenges of each technology, commonly used decision support tools, and major operators. In US only 13% of MSW is used for energy recovery and 53% is landfilled. There are 86 WTE facilities that mostly use Mass-Burn and Refuse-Derived Fuel technologies and are concentrated in densely populated northeast (predominantly in New York) and the State of Florida. For the rest of the country most of the MSW ends up in landfills equipped with gas recovery, which is supplied to homes or used for electricity generation. However, there are many pilot and experimental systems based on advanced gasification and pyrolysis processes, which are viewed as potential technologies to respond to an issue of landfills nearing full capacity in various US states. These systems are viewed as "cleaner" (65% less toxic residue) than established mass burn technologies but not matured to commercialization due technical and cost hurdles. Operation and maintenance costs between $40-$100 per ton of MSW were reported for gasification systems. The heterogeneous nature of MSW, gas cleaning and air pollution controls are the main disadvantages. Key design and decision support tools used by the scientific community and major operators in US include: Techno-economic analysis, Life cycle sustainability assessment, and Reverse logistics modeling. A conclusion drawn from reviewed studies is that adoption of thermal WTE technologies in US could continue to increase, albeit slowly, in coastal and urban areas lacking suitable lands for new landfills.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated Waste-to-Energy Process Optimization for Municipal Solid Waste
    Gabbar, Hossam A.
    Ahmad, Muhammad Sajjad
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (02)
  • [2] Review of current technologies used in municipal solid waste-to-energy facilities in Canada
    Shareefdeen, Zarook
    Elkamel, Ali
    Tse, Stanley
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (07) : 1837 - 1846
  • [3] Review of current technologies used in municipal solid waste-to-energy facilities in Canada
    Zarook Shareefdeen
    Ali Elkamel
    Stanley Tse
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17 : 1837 - 1846
  • [4] Waste-to-energy: A review of the status and benefits in USA
    Psomopolos, C. S.
    Bourka, A.
    Themelis, N. J.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (05) : 1718 - 1724
  • [5] A Review on Characteristics, Techniques, and Waste-to-Energy Aspects of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Bangladesh Perspective
    Roy, Hridoy
    Alam, Samiha Raisa
    Bin-Masud, Rayhan
    Prantika, Tonima Rahman
    Pervez, Md Nahid
    Islam, Md Shahinoor
    Naddeo, Vincenzo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [6] Municipal solid waste generation and the current state of waste-to-energy potential: State of art review
    Khan A.H.
    López-Maldonado E.A.
    Alam S.S.
    Khan N.A.
    López J.R.L.
    Herrera P.F.M.
    Abutaleb A.
    Ahmed S.
    Singh L.
    Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 267
  • [7] A critical review: emerging bioeconomy and waste-to-energy technologies for sustainable municipal solid waste management
    Tsui, To-Hung
    Wong, Jonathan W. C.
    WASTE DISPOSAL & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 1 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [8] Review of municipal solid waste management options in Malaysia, with an emphasis on sustainable waste-to-energy options
    Ogboo Chikere Aja
    Hussain H. Al-Kayiem
    Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2014, 16 : 693 - 710
  • [9] A critical review: emerging bioeconomy and waste-to-energy technologies for sustainable municipal solid waste management
    To-Hung Tsui
    Jonathan W. C. Wong
    Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy, 2019, 1 : 151 - 167
  • [10] Review of municipal solid waste management options in Malaysia, with an emphasis on sustainable waste-to-energy options
    Aja, Ogboo Chikere
    Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 16 (04) : 693 - 710