Genotypic variation for grain and stover yield of dryland (rabi) sorghum in India: 1. Magnitude of genotype x environment interactions

被引:9
作者
DeLacy, I. H. [1 ]
Kaul, S. [2 ]
Rana, B. S. [2 ]
Cooper, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Land Crop & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Natl Res Ctr Sorghum, Hyderabad 500030, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Pioneer HiBred Int Inc, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
关键词
Sorghum; Genotype-by-environment interaction; GEI; Drought; Variance components; Stability; Biplot; CROP; INFORMATION; PATTERNS; DISPLAY; DROUGHT; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2010.05.013
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Grain and stover yield are key traits for the improvement of rabi sorghum varieties and hybrids in India. Large genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI) were identified for both grain and stover yield based on 10 years' data available from the All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Program (AICSIP) experiments conducted from 1986/87 to 1996/97. From the estimates of the genotypic, GEI and residual components of variance for the four traits, a multi-environment testing strategy based on 15-20 locations, 2-3 years, and two replicates per trial would be required to achieve estimates of repeatability of approximately 0.70 for grain yield, 0.45 for stover yield, 0.70 for flowering time, and 0.85 for plant height. The results of these experiments indicate that over the 10-year period there was little genetic progress demonstrated for both yield traits and greater grain yields were associated with earlier flowering and greater stover yields were associated with greater plant height. Selection for greater grain and stover yield, while holding flowering time and plant height constant will be difficult. Unless the physiological trade-off between grain and stover yield and the causes of the large GEI for both traits can be better understood, conventional selection on phenotypic performance for grain and stover yield in the AICSIP trials is likely to continue to be slow. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 235
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Selection response in subdivided target regions [J].
Atlin, GN ;
Baker, RJ ;
McRae, KB ;
Lu, X .
CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (01) :7-13
[2]   A comparison of formal and participatory breeding approaches using selection theory [J].
Atlin, GN ;
Cooper, M ;
Bjornstad, Å .
EUPHYTICA, 2001, 122 (03) :463-475
[3]  
Basford K. E., 1996, P125
[4]   Genotype x environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia [J].
Basford, KE ;
Cooper, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1998, 49 (02) :153-174
[5]   Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects [J].
Chapman, S ;
Cooper, M ;
Podlich, D ;
Hammer, G .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (01) :99-113
[6]   Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Cooper, M ;
Hammer, GL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2002, 53 (04) :379-389
[7]   Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Cooper, M ;
Butler, DG ;
Henzell, RG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (02) :197-207
[8]   Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Hammer, GL ;
Butler, DG ;
Cooper, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (02) :223-233
[9]   Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Cooper, M ;
Hammer, GL ;
Butler, DG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (02) :209-221
[10]   Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials [J].
Chapman, Scott C. .
EUPHYTICA, 2008, 161 (1-2) :195-208