Assessment of the Validity of the Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 in Pituitary Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Trial

被引:17
作者
Sarris, Christina E. [1 ]
Little, Andrew S. [1 ]
Kshettry, Varun R. [2 ]
Rosen, Marc R. [3 ]
Rehl, Ryan M. [4 ]
Haegen, Timothy W. [4 ]
Rabinowitz, Mindy R. [3 ]
Nyquist, Gurston G. [3 ]
Recinos, Pablo F. [2 ,5 ]
Sindwani, Raj [2 ,5 ]
Woodard, Troy D. [2 ,5 ]
Farrell, Christopher J. [6 ]
Santarelli, Griffin D. [7 ]
Milligan, John [7 ]
Evans, James J. [6 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Neurosurg, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Valley ENT, Arizona Sinus Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Otolaryngol, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[7] Arizona Otolaryngol Consultants, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
Endoscopic surgery; nasal outcome; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/lary.29711
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis Sinonasal Outcomes Test-22 (SNOT-22) is used widely as a patient-reported sinonasal quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery. However, it has never been validated in this population. This study explores the psychometric validity of SNOT-22 to determine if it is a valid scale in patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary surgery. Study Design Multicenter prospective trial. Methods Adult patients (n = 113) with pituitary tumors undergoing endoscopic surgery were enrolled in a multicenter study. Patient-reported QOL was assessed using SNOT-22 and the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12. Face validity, internal consistency, responsiveness to clinical change, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were determined using standard statistical methods. Results Internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha at baseline and 2 weeks postoperatively were 0.911 and 0.922, indicating SNOT-22 performed well as a single construct. Mean QOL scores were significantly worse at 2 weeks than baseline (16.4 +/- 15.1 vs. 23.1 +/- 16.4, P < .001), indicating the scale is responsive to clinical change. However, only 11/22 items demonstrated significant changes in mean scores at 2 weeks. Correlation between scores at 2 and 3 weeks was high, suggesting good test-retest reliability, r(107) = 0.75, P < .001. Factor analysis suggests the five-factor solution proposed for the SNOT-22 in rhinosinusitis patients is not valid in pituitary surgery patients. Conclusions The SNOT-22 is a valid QOL instrument in patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary surgery. However, because it includes 22 items, can be applied only as a single construct, 50% of the items do not demonstrate changes after surgery, and is not as sensitive to change as other scales, shorter instruments developed specifically for this patient population may be preferable. Level of Evidence II Laryngoscope, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:E2757 / E2763
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The Clinical Importance of Quality-of-Life Scores in Patients with Skull Base Tumors: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature [J].
Amit, Moran ;
Abergel, Avraham ;
Fliss, Dan M. ;
Gil, Ziv .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (02) :175-181
[2]   Sinonasal quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery [J].
Bhenswala, Prashant N. ;
Schlosser, Rodney J. ;
Nguyen, Shau A. ;
Munawar, Suqrat ;
Rowan, Nicholas R. .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2019, 9 (10) :1105-1118
[3]   The Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Vestibular Schwannoma Quality-of-Life Assessment: An Important Step beyond P &lt; .05 [J].
Carlson, Matthew L. ;
Tveiten, Oystein Vesterli ;
Yost, Kathleen J. ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Lund-Johansen, Morten ;
Link, Michael J. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (02) :202-208
[4]   Long-Term Sinonasal Function Following Transnasal Pituitary Surgery: A Comparison of Surgical Approach [J].
Cho, Jemma ;
Grayson, Jessica W. ;
Christensen, Jenna ;
Winder, Mark J. ;
Sheehy, John ;
Steel, Tim ;
Bentivoglio, Peter ;
Barham, Henry P. ;
McCormack, Ann ;
Harvey, Richard J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2020, 34 (03) :361-368
[5]   Sinonasal Quality of Life Outcomes After Extended Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base [J].
Choi, Kevin J. ;
Ackall, Feras Y. ;
Truong, Tracy ;
Cheng, Tracy Z. ;
Kuchibhatla, Maragatha ;
Zomorodi, Ali R. ;
Codd, Patrick J. ;
Fecci, Peter E. ;
Hachem, Ralph Abi ;
Jang, David W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2019, 80 (04) :416-423
[6]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[7]   Comparative analysis of quality-of-life metrics after endoscopic surgery for sinonasal neoplasms [J].
Deckard, Nathan A. ;
Harrow, Brian R. ;
Barnett, Samuel L. ;
Batra, Pete S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2015, 29 (02) :151-155
[8]   Response Shift in Quality of Life After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis [J].
DeConde, Adam S. ;
Bodner, Todd E. ;
Mace, Jess C. ;
Smith, Timothy L. .
JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2014, 140 (08) :712-719
[9]   A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale [J].
Eton, DT ;
Cella, D ;
Yost, KJ ;
Yount, SE ;
Peterman, AH ;
Neuberg, DS ;
Sledge, GW ;
Wood, WC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (09) :898-910
[10]   Development of a cancer-specific anterior skull base quality-of-life questionnaire [J].
Gil, Z ;
Abergel, A ;
Spektor, S ;
Shabtai, E ;
Khafif, A ;
Fliss, DM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 100 (05) :813-819