Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia

被引:12
作者
Sulistyaningsih, Tri [1 ]
Nurmandi, Achmad [2 ]
Salahudin, Salahudin [1 ]
Roziqin, Ali [1 ]
Kamil, Muhammad [1 ]
Sihidi, Iradhad T. [1 ]
Romadhan, Ach. Apriyanto [1 ]
Loilatu, Mohammad Jafar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Muhammadiyah Malang, Dept Govt Studies, Malang 65144, Indonesia
[2] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Jusuf Kalla Sch Govt, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia
关键词
Brantas; watershed; institutional; collaboration; local government; policy; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; INSTITUTIONAL FIT; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.3390/su13126615
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper, which is focused on evaluating the policies and institutional control of the Brantas River Basin, East Java, Indonesia, aims to review government regulations on watershed governance in Indonesia. A qualitative approach to content analysis is used to explain and layout government regulations regarding planning, implementation, coordination, monitoring, evaluation, and accountability of the central and local governments in managing the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia. Nvivo 12 Plus software is used to map, analyze, and create data visualization to answer research questions. This study reveals that the management regulations of the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia, are based on a centralized system, which places the central government as an actor who plays an essential role in the formulation, implementation, and accountability of the Brantas watershed management. In contrast, East Java Province's regional government only plays a role in implementing and evaluating policies. The central government previously formulated the Brantas watershed. This research contributes to strengthening the management and institutional arrangement of the central government and local governments that support the realization of good governance of the Brantas watershed. Future research needs to apply a survey research approach that focuses on evaluating the capacity of the central government and local governments in supporting good management of the Brantas watershed.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Institutional failure in resource management [J].
Acheson, James M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2006, 35 :117-134
[2]   Institutional development for IWRM: an international perspective [J].
Bandaragoda, D. J. ;
Babel, Mukand S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2010, 8 (3-4) :215-224
[3]  
Bandaragoda D.J, 2000, INT WATER MANAG I IW, V2, P1
[4]   Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management [J].
Basco-Carrera, Laura ;
Warren, Andrew ;
van Beek, Eelco ;
Jonoski, Andreja ;
Giardino, Alessio .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 91 :95-110
[5]   Identifying governance gaps among interlinked sustainability challenges [J].
Bergsten, Arvid ;
Jiren, Tolera Senbeto ;
Leventon, Julia ;
Dorresteijn, Ire ;
Schultner, Jannik ;
Fischer, Joern .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 91 :27-38
[6]  
Bhat A., 2005, I POLICY ANAL RIVER
[7]   Collaborative Networks as a Core Enabler of Industry 4.0 [J].
Camarinha-Matos, Luis M. ;
Fornasiero, Rosanna ;
Afsarmanesh, Hamideh .
COLLABORATION IN A DATA-RICH WORLD, 2017, 506 :3-17
[8]   Policy and institutional dimensions of small-holder farmer innovations in the Thukela River Basin of South Africa and the Pangani River Basin of Tanzania: A comparative perspective [J].
Chikozho, C .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2005, 30 (11-16) :913-924
[9]   Diagnosing Institutional Fit: a Formal Perspective [J].
Cox, Michael .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (04)
[10]   Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social-Psychological Perspective [J].
DeCaro, Daniel A. ;
Stokes, Michael K. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04)