Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha® Compact and Baha Divino™

被引:24
作者
Kompis, Martin [1 ]
Krebs, Martin [1 ]
Haeusler, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept ENT Head Neck & Cranio Maxillo Facil Surg In, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Baha((R)) Compact; Baha Divino (TM); conductive hearing loss; speech recognition threshold; speech understanding in noise; directional microphone noise suppression;
D O I
10.1080/00016480601008408
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusions. Speech understanding is better with the Baha Divino (TM) than with the Baha() Compact in competing noise from the rear. No difference was found for speech understanding in quiet. Subjectively, overall sound quality and speech understanding were rated better for the Baha Divino (TM). Objectives. To compare speech understanding in quiet and in noise and subjective ratings for two different bone-anchored hearing aids: the recently developed Baha Divino (TM) and the Baha() Compact. Patients and methods. Seven adults with bilateral conductive or mixed hearing losses who were users of a boneanchored hearing aid were tested with the Baha() Compact in quiet and in noise. Tests were repeated after 3 months of use with the Baha Divino (TM). Results. There was no significant difference between the two types of Baha((R)) for speech understanding in quiet when tested with German numbers and monosyllabic words at presentation levels between 50 and 80 dB. For speech understanding in noise, an advantage of 2.3 dB for the Baha Divino (TM) vs the Baha((R)) Compact was found, if noise was emitted from a loudspeaker to the rear of the listener and the directional microphone noise reduction system was activated. Subjectively, the Baha Divino (TM) was rated statistically significantly better in terms of overall sound quality.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 835
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bosman AJ, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P158
[2]   THE ABBREVIATED PROFILE OF HEARING-AID BENEFIT [J].
COX, RM ;
ALEXANDER, GC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (02) :176-186
[3]  
*ENT MED SYST, 2000, BON ANCH APPL, V2, P8
[4]  
Kompis M, 2000, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V120, P855
[5]   Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test [J].
Kompis, M ;
Krebs, M ;
Häusler, R .
HNO, 2006, 54 (06) :445-450
[6]   Electromagnetic interference of bone-anchored hearing aids by cellular phones revisited [J].
Kompis, M ;
Häusler, R .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2002, 122 (05) :510-512
[7]   Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. I. Prediction of the signal-to-noise-ratio improvement [J].
Kompis, M ;
Dillier, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (03) :1123-1133
[8]   Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions [J].
Kompis, M ;
Dillier, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (03) :1134-1143
[9]  
KOMPIS M, 2004, AUDIOLOGIE, P183
[10]  
Lurquin P., 1996, Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, V50, P103