Manipulating picking sequences

被引:28
作者
Bouveret, Sylvain [1 ]
Lang, Jerome [2 ]
机构
[1] Grenoble INP, LIG, Grenoble, France
[2] Univ ParisDauphine, LAMSADE, Paris, France
来源
21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014) | 2014年 / 263卷
关键词
FAIR DIVISION; ENVY;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-141
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Picking sequences are a natural way of allocating indivisible items to agents in a decentralized manner: at each stage, a designated agent chooses an item among those that remain available. We address the computational issues of the manipulation of picking sequences by an agent or a coalition of agents. We show that a single agent can compute an optimal manipulation in polynomial time. Then we consider several notions of coalitional manipulation; for one of these notions, we show that computing an optimal manipulation is easy. We temper these results by giving a nontrivial upper bound on the impact of manipulation on the loss of social welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Bouveret S., 2011, PROC IJCAI11
[2]   Efficiency and envy-freeness in fair division of indivisible goods: Logical representation and complexity [J].
Bouveret, Sylvain ;
Lang, Jerome .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 32 :525-564
[3]  
Brams S., 2000, THE WIN WIN SOLUTION
[4]   Efficient fair division - Help the worst off or avoid envy? [J].
Brams, SJ ;
King, DL .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 2005, 17 (04) :387-421
[5]   The Multi-unit Assignment Problem: Theory and Evidence from Course Allocation at Harvard [J].
Budish, Eric ;
Cantillon, Estelle .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (05) :2237-2271
[6]   AI's War on Manipulation: Are We Winning? [J].
Faliszewski, Piotr ;
Procaccia, Ariel D. .
AI MAGAZINE, 2010, 31 (04) :53-64
[7]  
Kalinowski T., 2013, IJCAI
[8]  
Kalinowski T., 2013, AAAI
[9]   CLASS OF SEQUENTIAL GAMES [J].
KOHLER, DA ;
CHANDRAS.R .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1971, 19 (02) :270-&
[10]  
Svensson L.-G., 1999, SOCIAL CHOICE WELFAR, V16