Evaluation of Chronic Wound Treatment with the SNaP Wound Care System versus Modern Dressing Protocols

被引:29
作者
Lerman, Bruce
Oldenbrook, Leslie
Eichstadt, Shaundra L.
Ryu, Justin
Fong, Kenton D.
Schubart, Peter J. [1 ]
机构
[1] OConnor Hosp, OConnor Wound Care Clin, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
关键词
VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; THERAPY; STATE;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea4559
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditional negative-pressure wound therapy systems use an electrically powered pump to generate negative pressure at the wound bed. The SNaP Wound Care System is a novel, ultraportable device that delivers negative-pressure wound therapy without the use of an electrically powered pump. Methods: At an outpatient wound care clinic, 21 subjects with difficult-to-treat lower extremity ulcers received treatment with the SNaP System and were evaluated for wound healing for up to 4 months. Outcomes were then compared with 42 patient-matched controls treated at the same center with modern wound care protocols that included the use of Apligraf, Regranex, and skin grafting. Results: In the SNaP-treated group, 100 percent of subjects demonstrated improvement in wound size and 86 percent (18 of 21) exhibited a statistically significant healing trend (p < 0.05). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates of wound healing, SNaP-treated subjects healed in an average of 74.25 +/- 20.1 days from the start of SNaP treatment and the matched controls healed in an average of 148.73 +/- 63.1 days from the start of conventional treatment. This significantly faster healing time represents a 50 percent absolute reduction in time to healing (p < 0.0001) for subjects treated with the SNaP device. Conclusions: The findings reported here for the SNaP Wound Care System are similar to published reports for powered negative-pressure wound therapy devices for the treatment of highly challenging lower extremity wounds. This study suggests that the SNaP Wound Care System may be a useful addition to the techniques available to the wound care clinician. (Mast. Reconstr. Stew. 126: 1253, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1261
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The statistical analysis of failure time data
[2]   Vacuum-assisted closure: State of clinic art [J].
Argenta, Louis C. ;
Morykwas, Michael J. ;
Marks, Malcolm W. ;
DeFranzo, Anthony J. ;
Molnar, Joseph A. ;
David, Lisa R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (07) :127S-142S
[3]   Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1704-1710
[4]  
Barber C, 2008, J Wound Care, V17, P517
[5]  
BORGQUIST O, 2009, 24 ANN CLIN S ADV SK
[6]   Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy [J].
Campbell, Penny E. ;
Smith, Gary S. ;
Smith, Jennifer M. .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2008, 5 (02) :280-286
[7]  
Capobianco Claire M, 2009, Clin Podiatr Med Surg, V26, P619, DOI 10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.002
[8]   Apligraf in the Treatment of Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers [J].
Edmonds, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS, 2009, 8 (01) :11-18
[9]  
FONG KD, WOUNDS IN PRESS
[10]   The SNaP System: Biomechanical and Animal Model Testing of a Novel Ultraportable Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy System [J].
Fong, Kenton D. ;
Hu, Dean ;
Eichstadt, Shaundra ;
Gupta, Deepak M. ;
Pinto, Moshe ;
Gurtner, Geoffrey C. ;
Longaker, Michael T. ;
Lorenz, H. Peter .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (05) :1362-1371