Performance of the loblolly pine fusiform rust disease resistance gene (Fr1) in a slashXloblolly pine hybrid family

被引:2
作者
Huber, Dudley [1 ]
Amerson, Henry [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Forest pathology; Marker-trait association; RAPD markers; F-SP FUSIFORME; EARLY GROWTH; MAJOR GENE; SLASH PINE; EXPRESSION; VIRULENCE; FUNGUS;
D O I
10.1007/s11295-010-0353-3
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Unexpectedly high levels of field susceptibility to the fusiform rust fungus observed for slashXloblolly hybrid families in the Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program Pine Hybrid Trials led to several hypotheses concerning causation of the observed susceptibility. One of these hypotheses involved the failure of major resistance genes to appropriately function in this particular hybrid combination. This current work, involving the loblolly pine resistance gene Fr1 and a fusiform rust inoculum avirulent against Fr1 resistance in a greenhouse trial, delineates the investigation of major gene resistance for a particular slashXloblolly hybrid family. In this trial, the Fr1 resistance allele, derived from the heterozygous (Fr1/fr1) loblolly male parent and transferred to hybrid offspring that should have been segregating 1:1 for resistance, was fully penetrant. Likewise, in the pure-species loblolly control, the Fr1 resistance allele was again fully penetrant, and the performances of our hybrid family and the loblolly control family (both of which segregated for Fr1 resistance) were comparable. These results by inductive reasoning refute the hypothesis that major resistance genes are not appropriately functional in a slashXloblolly hybrid background.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 540
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AMERSON HV, 2005, P 28 BIENN SO FOR TR
[2]  
AMERSON HV, 1997, P 24 BIENN SO FOR TR
[3]  
BARBER JC, 1957, 104 USDA FOR SERV SE
[4]  
GEZAN SA, 2004, 46 ANN PROGR REP COO, P12
[5]  
GRIGGS MM, 1982, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V72, P816, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-72-816
[6]  
Hodge G. R., 1993, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, V17, P188
[7]   Resistance of Pinus taeda families under artificial inoculations with diverse fusiform rust pathogen populations and comparison with field trials [J].
Isik, Fikret ;
Amerson, Henry V. ;
Whetten, Ross W. ;
Garcia, Saul A. ;
Li, Bailian ;
McKeand, Steven E. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2008, 38 (10) :2687-2696
[8]  
JEWELL FF, 1967, FOREST SCI, V13, P413
[9]  
JORDAN AP, 1997, THESIS NC STATE U RA, P105
[10]   Clonal evaluation for fusiform rust disease resistance: effects of pathogen virulence and disease escape [J].
Kayihan, Goegce C. ;
Nelson, C. Dana ;
Huber, Dudley A. ;
Amerson, Henry V. ;
White, Timothy L. ;
Davis, John M. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2010, 40 (06) :1042-1050