Advances in Applied Zoo Animal Welfare Science

被引:61
作者
Ward, Samantha J. [1 ]
Sherwen, Sally [2 ]
Clark, Fay E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Anim Rural & Environm Sci, Southwell, England
[2] Zoos Victoria, Wildlife Conservat & Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Bristol Zoo Gardens, Bristol Zool Soc, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Research; behavior; human-animal interaction; cognitive enrichment; management; DOLPHINS TURSIOPS-TRUNCATUS; ANTICIPATORY BEHAVIOR; SPECIES-DIFFERENCES; TECHNOLOGY; ENRICHMENT; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGE; BIOLOGY; STRESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/10888705.2018.1513842
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Nonhuman animal welfare science is the scientific study of the welfare state of animals that attempts to make inferences about how animals feel from their behavior, endocrine function, and/or signs of physical health. These welfare measurements are applicable within zoos yet inherently more complex than in farms and laboratories. This complexity is due to the vast number of species housed, lack of fundamental biological information, and relatively lower sample sizes and levels of experimental control. This article summarizes the invited presentations on the topic of Advances in Applied Animal Welfare Science, given at the Fourth Global Animal Welfare Congress held jointly by the Detroit Zoological Society and the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums in 2017. The article focuses on current trends in research on zoo animal welfare under the following themes: (a) human-animal interactions and relationships, (b) anticipatory behavior, (c) cognitive enrichment, (d) behavioral biology, and (e) reproductive and population management. It highlights areas in which further advancements in zoo animal welfare science are needed and the challenges that may be faced in doing so.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[71]   APPLYING CLINICALLY PROVEN HUMAN TECHNIQUES FOR CONTRACEPTION AND FERTILITY TO ENDANGERED SPECIES AND ZOO ANIMALS: A REVIEW [J].
Silber, Sherman J. ;
Barbey, Natalie ;
Lenahan, Kathy ;
Silber, David Z. .
JOURNAL OF ZOO AND WILDLIFE MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (04) :S111-S122
[72]   Human-Animal Relationships in Zoo-Housed Orangutans (P. abelii) and Gorillas (G. g. gorilla): The Effects of Familiarity [J].
Smith, Joshua J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2014, 76 (10) :942-955
[73]  
Spinka M., 2011, Animal welfare, P27, DOI 10.1079/9781845936594.0027
[74]   A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems [J].
Spruijt, BM ;
van den Bos, R ;
Pijlman, FTA .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2001, 72 (02) :145-171
[75]  
Tarou LR, 2004, ANIM WELFARE, V13, P445
[76]  
Tribe Andrew, 2003, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, V8, P65, DOI 10.1080/10871200390180163
[77]  
Vasconcellos Da Silva A., 2016, PLOS ONE, V11
[78]   Keeper-Animal Interactions: Differences between the Behaviour of Zoo Animals Affect Stockmanship [J].
Ward, Samantha J. ;
Melfi, Vicky .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10)
[79]   The implications of husbandry training on zoo animal response rates [J].
Ward, Samantha J. ;
Melfi, Vicky .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2013, 147 (1-2) :179-185
[80]   Searching for Behavioral Indicators of Welfare in Zoos: Uncovering Anticipatory Behavior [J].
Watters, Jason V. .
ZOO BIOLOGY, 2014, 33 (04) :251-256