Reducing the Effects of Background Noise During Auditory Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Speech Processing: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparisons Between Two Image Acquisition Schemes and Noise Cancellation

被引:17
作者
Blackman, Graham A. [1 ]
Hall, Deborah A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] MRC Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham, England
[2] NIHR Natl Biomed Res Unit Hearing, Nottingham, England
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2011年 / 54卷 / 02期
关键词
neuroimaging; active noise cancellation; audibility; intelligibility; frequency discrimination; ACOUSTIC NOISE; CORTEX; PERCEPTION; RESPONSES; MRI; ACTIVATION; SILENT;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0143)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The intense sound generated during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) complicates studies of speech and hearing. This experiment evaluated the benefits of using active noise cancellation (ANC), which attenuates the level of the scanner sound at the participant's ear by up to 35 dB around the peak at 600 Hz. Method: Speech and narrowband noise were presented at a low sound level to 8 listeners during fMRI using 2 common scanning protocols: short ("continuous") and long ("sparse") temporal schemes. Three outcome measures were acquired simultaneously during fMRI: ratings of listening quality, discrimination performance, and brain activity. Results: Subjective ratings and discrimination performance were significantly improved by ANC and sparse acquisition. Sparse acquisition was the more robust method for detecting auditory cortical activity. ANC reduced some of the "extra-auditory" activity that might be associated with the effort required for perceptual discrimination in a noisy environment and also offered small improvements for detecting activity within Heschl's gyrus and planum polare. Conclusions: For the scanning protocols evaluated here, the sparse temporal scheme was the more preferable for detecting sound-evoked activity. In addition, ANC ensures that listening difficulty is determined more by the chosen stimulus parameters and less by the adverse testing environment.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 704
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P835 ITUT
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 28 INT C AUD INNSB
[3]   Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise [J].
Bandettini, PA ;
Jesmanowicz, A ;
Van Kylen, J ;
Birn, RM ;
Hyde, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (03) :410-416
[4]   Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: A low-noise fMRI study [J].
Brechmann, A ;
Baumgart, F ;
Scheich, H .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :423-433
[5]   Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: Method and psychoacoustical evaluation [J].
Chambers, J ;
Akeroyd, MA ;
Summerfield, AQ ;
Palmer, AR .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (06) :3041-3054
[6]   Automated post-hoc noise cancellation tool for audio recordings acquired in an MRI scanner [J].
Cusack, R ;
Cumming, N ;
Bor, D ;
Norris, D ;
Lyzenga, J .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2005, 24 (04) :299-304
[7]  
Davis MH, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P3423
[8]  
Edmister WB, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P89, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:2<89::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-N
[10]  
Foster JR, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P157, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<157::AID-JMRI17>3.0.CO