A comprehensive review on the stinging nettle effect and efficacy profiles. Part II: Urticae radix

被引:77
作者
Chrubasik, Julia E.
Roufogalis, Basil D.
Wagner, Hildebert
Chrubasik, Sigrun
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Inst Rechts Med, Dept Forens Med, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Herbal Med Res & Educ Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Munich, Zentrum Pharmaforsch Haus B, Dept Pharm, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
urticae radix; stinging nettle root; pharmacology; efficacy profiles;
D O I
10.1016/j.phymed.2007.03.014
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Nettle root is recommended for complaints associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We therefore conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to summarise the pharmacological and clinical effects of this plant material. Only a few components of the active principle have been identified and the mechanism of action is still unclear. It seems likely that sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), aromatase, epidermal growth factor and prostate steroid membrane receptors are involved in the anti-prostatic effect, but less likely that 5 alpha-reductase or androgen receptors are involved. Extract and a polysaccharide fraction were shown to exert anti-inflammatory activity. A proprietary methanolic nettle root extract and particular fractions inhibited cell proliferation. Isolated lectins (UDA) were shown to be promising immunomodulatory agents, having also anti-viral and fungistatic effects. However, despite these in vitro studies it is unclear whether the in-vitro or animal data are a surrogate for clinical effects. The clinical evidence of effectiveness for nettle root in the treatment of BPH is based on many open studies. A small number of randomised controlled studies indicate that a proprietary methanolic extract is effective in improving BPH complaints. However, the significance and magnitude of the effect remains to be established in further confirmatory studies before nettle root treatment may be accepted in the guidelines for BPH treatment. The risk for adverse events during nettle root treatment is very low, as is its toxicity. Pre-clinical safety data remain to be completed. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 579
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Alken CE, 1973, UROLOGE B, V13, P95
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, UROLOGE B
[3]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[4]  
Barsom S, 1979, ZFA (Stuttgart), V55, P1947
[5]  
BARTSCH W, 1992, BENIGNE PROSTATAHYPE, V22, P108
[6]  
BAUER HW, 1988, BENIGNE PROSTATAHYPE, V19, P44
[7]  
BECK E, 1989, DTSCH APOTHEK ZTG, V129, P2169
[8]   CLINICAL-STUDIES ON THE PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC ADENOMA WITH EXTRACT OF URTICA ROOT [J].
BELAICHE, P ;
LIEVOUX, O .
PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 1991, 5 (06) :267-269
[9]  
BOCK K, 1988, THESIS LIB U MARBURG
[10]  
BRANDSTADTER L, 1987, THERAPIEWOCHE, V37, P1918