Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?

被引:148
作者
Dunbar, R. I. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, S Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
network size; social networking sites (SNSs); social brain hypothesis; egocentric networks; INTERNET USE; FRIENDS; CONSEQUENCES; ADOLESCENTS; SOCIABILITY; TECHNOLOGY; LAUGHTER; CORE; TOO;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.150292
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The social brain hypothesis has suggested that natural social network sizes may have a characteristic size in humans. This is determined in part by cognitive constraints and in part by the time costs of servicing relationships. Online social networking offers the potential to break through the glass ceiling imposed by at least the second of these, potentially enabling us to maintain much larger social networks. This is tested using two separate UK surveys, each randomly stratified by age, gender and regional population size. The data show that the size and range of online egocentric social networks, indexed as the number of Facebook friends, is similar to that of offline face-to-face networks. For one sample, respondents also specified the number of individuals in the inner layers of their network (formally identified as support clique and sympathy group), and these were also similar in size to those observed in offline networks. This suggests that, as originally proposed by the social brain hypothesis, there is a cognitive constraint on the size of social networks that even the communication advantages of onlinemedia are unable to overcome. In practical terms, it may reflect the fact that real (as opposed to casual) relationships require at least occasional face-to-face interaction to maintain them.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier
[2]   The Internet and social life [J].
Bargh, JA ;
McKenna, KYA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 :573-590
[3]   COMPARING 4 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS [J].
BERNARD, HR ;
JOHNSEN, EC ;
KILLWORTH, PD ;
MCCARTY, C ;
SHELLEY, GA ;
ROBINSON, S .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1990, 12 (03) :179-215
[4]   Amygdala volume and social network size in humans [J].
Bickart, Kevin C. ;
Wright, Christopher I. ;
Dautoff, Rebecca J. ;
Dickerson, Bradford C. ;
Barrett, Lisa Feldman .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (02) :163-164
[5]  
Boase J., 2006, STRENGTH INTERNET TI
[6]  
Brandtzaeg Petter Bae, 2010, International Journal of Web Based Communities, V6, P231
[7]   Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications - A Longitudinal Study [J].
Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 (04) :467-488
[8]   Too Many Facebook "Friends"? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites [J].
Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae ;
Lueders, Marika ;
Skjetne, Jan Havard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2010, 26 (11-12) :1006-1030
[9]   HUMAN SYMPATHY GROUPS [J].
BUYS, CJ ;
LARSON, KL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1979, 45 (02) :547-553
[10]   FRIENDSHIPS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS IN CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE - FLUIDITY, RELIABILITY, AND INTERRELATIONS [J].
CAIRNS, RB ;
LEUNG, MC ;
BUCHANAN, L ;
CAIRNS, BD .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 66 (05) :1330-1345