What Can We Learn From a Human-Rights Based Approach to Disability for Public and Patient Involvement in Research?

被引:5
作者
Browne, Jacqui [1 ]
Dorris, Emma R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Res Off, PPI Ignite Network UCD, Dublin, Ireland
来源
FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
public and patient involvement; social model of disability; inclusive research; responsible research & innovation (RRI); engagement (involvement); HEALTH; EXCLUSION; PEOPLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fresc.2022.878231
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Public and Patient Involvement can align both the research process and its outcomes with the values, needs and expectations of society. By fostering the design of inclusive, engaged, and sustainable practices, research and research integrity can be improved. Devolving power to involve patients and relevant publics in deliberative decision making can produce better research outcomes. Disabled people are often categorized as "Hard to Reach." There is a varied and complex ecosystem of societal challenges of living with a disability that reinforce this. However, if researchers are to meet their obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, disabled people should be included in public and patient involvement for all research in which they have a stake. In this article we argue that a better understanding of rights-based approaches and the social model of disability within the wider research community can help to remove barriers to research involvement for disabled persons. We focus on articles 3, 4, and 9 of the Convention and discuss how the principles of participation, accessibility, and equality of opportunity can be applied to research involvement, and how their adoption can facilitate truly meaningful PPI in disability research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
    Alberts, Bruce
    Kirschner, Marc W.
    Tilghman, Shirley
    Varmus, Harold
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (16) : 5773 - 5777
  • [2] ANDERSON TP, 1975, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V56, P101
  • [3] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20): : 2191 - 2194
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, COMMENT NO G 7 2018
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities
  • [6] The World Report on Disability
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    [J]. DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2011, 26 (05) : 655 - 658
  • [7] The Association of Group-Based Discrimination with Health and Well-Being: A Comparison of Ableism with Other "Isms"
    Branco, Carla
    Ramos, Miguel R.
    Hewstone, Miles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2019, 75 (03) : 814 - 846
  • [8] Breslin M.L., 2009, The Current State of Health Care for People with Disabilities
  • [9] Burgstahler S., 2009, Universal Design in Education: Principles and Applications. DO-IT
  • [10] Charlton James, 1998, NOTHING US US DISABI