A Comparison of Three Image Fidelity Metrics of Different Computational Principles for JPEG2000 Compressed Abdomen CT Images

被引:20
作者
Kim, Kil Joong [2 ]
Kim, Bohyoung [3 ]
Mantiuk, Rafal [4 ]
Richter, Thomas [5 ]
Lee, Hyunna [3 ]
Kang, Heung-Sik [1 ]
Seo, Jinwook [3 ]
Lee, Kyoung Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gyeonggi Do 463707, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Appl Life Sci, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[4] Bangor Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Bangor LL57 2DG, Gwynedd, Wales
[5] Univ Stuttgart, Ctr Informat, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Computed tomography; image compression; image fidelity metric; JPEG2000; VISUALLY LOSSLESS THRESHOLD; WAVELET COMPRESSION; ABDOMINAL CT; THIN-SECTION; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; RATIO; LUNG; ARTIFACTS;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2010.2049655
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles-peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), high-dynamic range visual difference predictor (HDR-VDP), and multiscale structural similarity (MS-SSIM)-in measuring the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed abdomen computed tomography images from a viewpoint of visually lossless compression. Three hundred images with 0.67- or 5-mm section thickness were compressed to one of five compression ratios ranging from reversible compression to 15:1. The fidelity of each compressed image was measured by five radiologists' visual analyses (distinguishable or indistinguishable from the original) and the three metrics. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients of the PSNR, HDR-VDP, and MS-SSIM values with the number of readers responding as indistinguishable were 0.86, 0.94, and 0.86, respectively. Using the pooled readers' responses as the reference standard, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for the HDR-VDP (0.99) was significantly greater than that for the PSNR (0.95) (p < 0.001) and for the MS-SSIM (0.96) (p = 0.003), and there was no significant difference between the PSNR and MS-SSIM (p = 0.70). In measuring the image fidelity, the HDR-VDP outperforms the PSNR and MS-SSIM, and the MS-SSIM and PSNR are comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1503
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, MODERN IMAGE QUALITY
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, FIN REP VID QUAL EXP
  • [3] Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images
    Bajpa, Vasundhara
    Lee, Kyoung Ho
    Kim, Bohyoung
    Kim, Kil Joong
    Kim, Tae Jung
    Kim, Young Hoon
    Kang, Heung Sik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (02) : W38 - W43
  • [4] Structural similarity quality metrics in a coding context: Exploring the space of realistic distortions
    Brooks, Alan C.
    Zhao, Xiaonan
    Pappas, Thrasyvoulos N.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2008, 17 (08) : 1261 - 1273
  • [5] THORACIC CT IMAGES - EFFECT OF LOSSY IMAGE COMPRESSION ON DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY
    COSMAN, PC
    DAVIDSON, HC
    BERGIN, CJ
    TSENG, CW
    MOSES, LE
    RISKIN, EA
    OLSHEN, RA
    GRAY, RM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 517 - 524
  • [6] Daly Scott, 1993, P179
  • [7] Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression
    Eckert, MP
    Bradley, AP
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1998, 70 (03) : 177 - 200
  • [8] Fleiss J., 1979, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V3, P537, DOI DOI 10.1177/014662167900300410
  • [9] Focal hepatic lesions: Effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT
    Goldberg, MA
    Gazelle, GS
    Boland, GW
    Hahn, PF
    MayoSmith, WW
    Pivovarov, M
    Halpern, EF
    Wittenberg, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [10] Goodenough DJ., 2000, HDB MEDICAL IMAGING, V1, P511