Lacosamide as a first-line treatment option in focal epilepsy: a cost-utility analysis for the Greek healthcare system

被引:10
作者
Geitona, Mary [1 ]
Stamuli, Eugena [2 ,7 ]
Giannakodimos, Stylianos [3 ]
Kimiskidis, Vasileios K. [4 ]
Kountouris, Vasileios [5 ]
Charokopou, Mata [6 ]
Christou, Petros [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peloponnese, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Dept Social & Educ Policy, Damaskinou & Kolokotroni Str, Corinth 20100, Greece
[2] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] G GennimatasGen Hosp Athens, Athens, Greece
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Univ Hosp, Lab Clin Neurophysiol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[5] UCB Pharma, Athens, Greece
[6] UCB Biopharma SPRL, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Epilepsy; first-line treatment; lacosamide; economic evaluation; Greece; INTERNATIONAL-LEAGUE; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; ILAE COMMISSION; SEIZURES; MONOTHERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; EFFICACY; UK;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2019.1571499
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Epilepsy is the most common serious neurological disorder worldwide. Approximately 40% of patients with focal epileptic seizures remain uncontrolled with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy or polytherapy. Lacosamide has been recently approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy for the treatment of focal seizures. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lacosamide compared with zonisamide as first-line treatment of focal epilepsy in patients with epilepsy aged >= 16 years to inform clinical decision-making in Greece. Methods: A discrete event simulation model was adapted to reflect treatment pathways and resource use within the Greek national healthcare system, as specified by clinical experts. The model captures time-varying events and patient characteristics. Clinical inputs were sourced from pivotal trials and a network meta-analysis comparing lacosamide with other AEDs. The model predicts disease progression and seizures, relevant and most common adverse events, withdrawal due to lack of efficacy or adverse events, and epilepsy-specific and all-cause mortality over a 2-year time horizon. Unit costs were retrieved from published Greek sources. Health outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); secondary outcome was the cost per seizure avoided. Robustness of the results was tested with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: The lacosamide treatment pathway was associated with higher costs (i.e. euro1,064) and an additional 0.119 QALYs when compared with zonisamide, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro8,938 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results are most sensitive to the efficacy and utility estimates. Limitations: There are a number of limitations which stem from the process of model adaptation and lack of local real-world evidence. Conclusions: Lacosamide is a cost-effective option at a willingness-to-pay threshold of euro30,000 per QALY, representing a valuable monotherapy treatment option for patients with focal epileptic seizures in the Greek setting.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, GUID MAN
  • [2] Baulac M, 2016, LOCATION C COPENHAGE
  • [3] Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy versus controlled-release carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
    Baulac, Michel
    Rosenow, Felix
    Toledo, Manuel
    Terada, Kiyohito
    Li, Ting
    De Backer, Marc
    Werhahn, Konrad
    Brock, Melissa
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [4] Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009
    Berg, Anne T.
    Berkovic, Samuel F.
    Brodie, Martin J.
    Buchhalter, Jeffrey
    Cross, J. Helen
    Boas, Walter van Emde
    Engel, Jerome
    French, Jacqueline
    Glauser, Tracy A.
    Mathern, Gary W.
    Moshe, Solomon L.
    Nordli, Douglas
    Plouin, Perrine
    Scheffer, Ingrid E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2010, 51 (04) : 676 - 685
  • [5] Briggs AH, 2006, Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation
  • [6] Epilepsy: randomised trials and genetic tribulations
    Brodie, Martin J.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2008, 7 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [7] Antiepileptic drug therapy the story so far
    Brodie, Martin J.
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2010, 19 (10): : 650 - 655
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF BRIVARACETAM VERSUS OTHER ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS USED AS ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT FOR FOCAL SEIZURES IN THE UK: A DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION MODEL
    Charokopou, M.
    Sander, J.
    Saha, R.
    Beard, S.
    Kidd, R.
    Coward, E.
    Plumb, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A365 - A365
  • [9] Healthcare utilization and costs in adults with stable and uncontrolled epilepsy
    Cramer, Joyce A.
    Wang, Zhixiao J.
    Chang, Eunice
    Powers, Annette
    Copher, Ronda
    Cherepanov, Dasha
    Broder, Michael S.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 31 : 356 - 362
  • [10] England MJ, 2012, QUALITY LIFE COMMUNI, V13