FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FOLLOWING MOTOR CORTEX LESIONS IN NON-HUMAN PRIMATES: EXPERIMENTAL IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN STROKE PATIENTS

被引:47
作者
Darling, Warren G. [1 ]
Pizzimenti, Marc A. [2 ]
Morecraft, Robert J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Motor Control Labs, Dept Hlth & Human Physiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ S Dakota, Sanford Sch Med, Div Basic Biomed Sci, Lab Neurol Sci, Vermillion, SD 57069 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Motor cortex; lesion; hand; grasp; manipulation; INDIVIDUATED FINGER MOVEMENTS; MONKEYS MACACA-FASCICULARIS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; ADULT SQUIRREL-MONKEYS; MEDIAL PREMOTOR CORTEX; RHESUS-MONKEY; HAND AREA; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; CEREBRAL-CORTEX; SPINAL-CORD;
D O I
10.1142/S0219635211002737
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This review discusses selected classical works and contemporary research on recovery of contralesional fine hand motor function following lesions to motor areas of the cerebral cortex in non-human primates. Findings from both the classical literature and contemporary studies show that lesions of cortical motor areas induce paresis initially, but are followed by remarkable recovery of fine hand/digit motor function that depends on lesion size and post-lesion training. Indeed, in recent work where considerable quantification of fine digit function associated with grasping and manipulating small objects has been observed, very favorable recovery is possible with minimal forced use of the contralesional limb. Studies of the mechanisms underlying recovery have shown that following small lesions of the digit areas of primary motor cortex (M1), there is expansion of the digit motor representations into areas of M1 that did not produce digit movements prior to the lesion. However, after larger lesions involving the elbow, wrist and digit areas of M1, no such expansion of the motor representation was observed, suggesting that recovery was due to other cortical or subcortical areas taking over control of hand/digit movements. Recently, we showed that one possible mechanism of recovery after lesion to the arm areas of M1 and lateral premotor cortex is enhancement of corticospinal projections from the medially located supplementary motor area (M2) to spinal cord laminae containing neurons which have lost substantial input from the lateral motor areas and play a critical role in reaching and digit movements. Because human stroke and brain injury patients show variable, and usually poorer, recovery of hand motor function than that of nonhuman primates after motor cortex damage, we conclude with a discussion of implications of this work for further experimentation to improve recovery of hand function in human stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 384
页数:32
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC RESPONSES EVOKED IN MUSCLES OF THE FORELIMB BY INTRACORTICAL STIMULATION IN THE CAT [J].
ARMSTRONG, DM ;
DREW, T .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1985, 367 (OCT) :309-326
[2]   A STUDY OF LOCALIZATION IN THE CORTICO-SPINAL TRACTS OF MONKEY AND RAT [J].
BARNARD, JW ;
WOOLSEY, CN .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1956, 105 (01) :25-50
[3]   Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke [J].
Bhatt, Ela ;
Nagpal, Ashima ;
Greer, Kristine H. ;
Grunewald, Tiffany K. ;
Steele, Jennifer L. ;
Wiemiller, Jeff W. ;
Lewis, Scott M. ;
Carey, James R. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (04) :435-447
[4]  
Black P, 1974, Trans Am Neurol Assoc, V99, P188
[5]  
Black P, 1971, Trans Am Neurol Assoc, V96, P173
[6]  
BLACK P, 1975, CIBA ELSEVIER S, V34, P65
[7]   ANTERIOR CEREBRAL-ARTERY TERRITORY INFARCTION IN THE LAUSANNE STROKE REGISTRY - CLINICAL AND ETIOLOGIC PATTERNS [J].
BOGOUSSLAVSKY, J ;
REGLI, F .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 47 (02) :144-150
[8]  
BRINKMAN C, 1984, J NEUROSCI, V4, P918
[10]   SELECTIVE FACILITATION OF DIFFERENT HAND MUSCLES BY SINGLE CORTICOSPINAL NEURONS IN THE CONSCIOUS MONKEY [J].
BUYS, EJ ;
LEMON, RN ;
MANTEL, GWH ;
MUIR, RB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1986, 381 :529-549