Characterization of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: effects of operating conditions and specific ion rejection

被引:30
作者
Vaseghi, Ghazaleh [1 ]
Ghassemi, Abbas [2 ]
Loya, Jim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Inst Energy & Environm IEE WERC, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
关键词
Desalination; Water treatment; Membrane; Reverse osmosis; Nanofiltration; Characterization; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1080/19443994.2015.1135825
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are two of the most commonly used technologies for desalinating brackish and saline waters to provide potable water. However, there is still lack of a thorough comparison between these two methods providing the better option in different conditions. Therefore, in this paper, salt rejection and the effects of operation conditions on the performance of RO and NF systems are compared. Inlet water conductivity, inlet pH, permeate flow rate, temperature, and recovery rate are used as variable operating conditions, and permeate conductivity is considered as the target of comparison as it reflects the level of salts in product water. Five combinations of inland brackish water, drawn from wells located at the experimental site, were applied as different feed waters and five distinct types of membranes, three RO and two NF, were studied using pilot-scale equipment. To allow meaningful comparison among RO and NF membrane performances, identical hydrodynamic operating conditions and feed water chemistries were employed during tests. In both systems, negative rejection occurred for specific ions. The results suggest that the performances of RO and NF membranes (i.e. the amount of total dissolved salts remaining in produced water) are quite different. Based on the experimental data, new insights can be reached regarding the best choice of membrane, based on the minimization of electrical conductivity and the ability to reject specific ions in different operating conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:23461 / 23472
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AWWA, 1995, EL EL REV
[2]   On the direct osmotic concentration of liquid foods. Part I: Impact of process parameters on process performance [J].
Dova, Magda I. ;
Petrotos, Konstantinos B. ;
Lazarides, Harris N. .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2007, 78 (02) :422-430
[3]  
Elsaid K., 2012, Advances in Chemical Engineering, P450, DOI [10.5772/33134, DOI 10.5772/33134]
[4]   Experimental analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration membranes [J].
Gilron, J ;
Gara, N ;
Kedem, O .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 185 (02) :223-236
[5]   Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges [J].
Greenlee, Lauren F. ;
Lawler, Desmond F. ;
Freeman, Benny D. ;
Marrot, Benoit ;
Moulin, Philippe .
WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (09) :2317-2348
[6]  
Hanrahan C.P., 2013, high-recovery electrodialysis reversal for the desalination of inland brackish waters
[7]   Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes [J].
Herzberg, Moshe ;
Kang, Seoktae ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (12) :4393-4398
[8]   Recent advances on membrane processes for the concentration of fruit juices: a review [J].
Jiao, B ;
Cassano, A ;
Drioli, E .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2004, 63 (03) :303-324
[9]   FOULING IN TANGENTIAL-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION - THE EFFECT OF COLLOID SIZE AND COAGULATION PRETREATMENT [J].
LAHOUSSINETURCAUD, V ;
WIESNER, MR ;
BOTTERO, JY .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1990, 52 (02) :173-190
[10]  
Leitner G.F., 1998, INT DESALINATION WAT, V7, P10