When and why hierarchy steepness is related to team performance

被引:24
作者
Cantimur, Yeliz [1 ]
Rink, Floor [1 ]
van der Vegt, Gerben S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept HRM & OB, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
status hierarchy steepness; task complexity; intra-team conflict; team performance; INTRAGROUP CONFLICT; DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES; ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS; SOCIAL-STATUS; COMMUNICATION NETS; INDIVIDUAL STATUS; TASK COMPLEXITY; GROUP OUTCOMES; WORK GROUPS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2016.1148030
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study develops and tests a contingency theory on the functions of status hierarchy steepness in teams. Findings from a field study among 438 employees working in 72 work teams across diverse business settings demonstrate that task complexity moderates the relationships between status hierarchy steepness, different types of team conflict, and team performance. Steeper status hierarchies were negatively related to both process and task conflict, and hence increased team performance in teams working on tasks with lower complexity but did not yield such clear conflict and performance effects in teams working on more complex tasks. By showing that various levels of task complexity determine whether status hierarchy steepness has a conflict-regulating function that drives team performance, this research generates valuable insights about the context dependency of team responses to status hierarchy steepness.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 673
页数:16
相关论文
共 112 条
[91]  
Shah P., 1993, Group Decision and Negotiation, V2, P149, DOI [10.1007/BF01884769., 10.1007/BF01884769, DOI 10.1007/BF01884769]
[92]   SOME EFFECTS OF PROBLEM COMPLEXITY UPON PROBLEM SOLUTION EFFICIENCY IN DIFFERENT COMMUNICATION NETS [J].
SHAW, ME .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 48 (03) :211-217
[93]   Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms [J].
Siegel, PA ;
Hambrick, DC .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (03) :259-274
[94]   Status Hierarchies and the Organization of Collective Action [J].
Simpson, Brent ;
Willer, Robb ;
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2012, 30 (03) :149-166
[95]   An evolutionarily stable strategy for aggressiveness in feeding groups [J].
Sirot, E .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 11 (04) :351-356
[96]   Impact of environmental disturbance on the stability and benefits of individual status within dominance hierarchies [J].
Sneddon, LU ;
Hawkesworth, S ;
Braithwaite, VA ;
Yerbury, J .
ETHOLOGY, 2006, 112 (05) :437-447
[97]   The influence of the steepness of dominance hierarchies on reciprocity and interchange in captive groups of bonobos (Pan paniscus) [J].
Stevens, JMG ;
Vervaecke, H ;
de Vries, H ;
Van Elsacker, L .
BEHAVIOUR, 2005, 142 :941-960
[98]   The Too-Much-Talent Effect: Team Interdependence Determines When More Talent Is Too Much or Not Enough [J].
Swaab, Roderick I. ;
Schaerer, Michael ;
Anicich, Eric M. ;
Ronay, Richard ;
Galinsky, Adam D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (08) :1581-1591
[99]   An unconscious desire for hierarchy? the motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners [J].
Tiedens, Larissa Z. ;
Unzueta, Miguel M. ;
Young, Maia J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 93 (03) :402-414
[100]   RECONSIDERING PAY DISPERSION'S EFFECT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF INTERDEPENDENT WORK: RECONCILING SORTING AND PAY INEQUALITY [J].
Trevor, Charlie O. ;
Reilly, Greg ;
Gerhart, Barry .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (03) :585-610