Co-Interviewing in Qualitative Social Research: Prospects, Merits and Considerations

被引:13
作者
Velardo, Stefania [1 ]
Elliott, Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Educ Psychol & Social Work, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS | 2021年 / 20卷
关键词
methods in qualitative inquiry; constructivist GT; ethical inquiry; community-based research; grounded theory; MULTIPLE INTERVIEWERS; REFLEXIVITY;
D O I
10.1177/16094069211054920
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, we seek to open a dialogue about the approach of co-interviewing, which, to our surprise, has not received much attention in the realm of qualitative social research. The co-interviewing approach stands apart from 'multiple' interviewing, in which two or more researchers are tasked with conducting interviews in a single research study. Instead, this approach involves two researchers actively taking part in the same interview. In a qualitative grounded theory study that sought to explore doctoral students' emotional well-being, we adopted the approach of co-interviewing each of our participants. This process involved us sharing the responsibilities of asking questions, probing, note taking and making observations. Our experience has led us to critically examine this unique approach to interviewing, and here, in this paper, we offer insights about its potential to enhance the generation of data and the research process. In doing so, we draw on literature, whilst reflecting on key concepts including power, reflexivity and well-being, by considering the positions of participants and researchers alike.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] What is 'sensitive' about sensitive research? The sensitive researchers' perspective
    Mallon, Sharon
    Elliott, Iris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 24 (05) : 523 - 535
  • [12] Using Multiple Interviewers in Qualitative Research Studies The Influence of Ethic of Care Behaviors in Research Interview Settings
    Matteson, Shirley M.
    Lincoln, Yvonna S.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2009, 15 (04) : 659 - 674
  • [13] The Couple Interview as a Method of Collecting Data in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Studies
    Mavhandu-Mudzusi, Azwihangwisi Helen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [14] Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology
    Morrow, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 52 (02) : 250 - 260
  • [15] Munro A., 2004, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V7, P289, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557021000024758
  • [16] 'It's good to be able to talk': An exploration of the complexities of participant and researcher relationships when conducting sensitive research
    Newton, Victoria Louise
    [J]. WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2017, 61 : 93 - 99
  • [17] Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability
    Raheim, Malfrid
    Magnussen, Liv Heide
    Sekse, Ragnhild Johanne Tveit
    Lunde, Ashild
    Jacobsen, Torild
    Blystad, Astrid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2016, 11
  • [18] Co-interviewing across gender and culture: expanding qualitative research methods in Melanesia
    Redman-MacLaren, Michelle L.
    Api, Unia K.
    Darius, Matupit
    Tommbe, Rachael
    Mafile'o, Tracie A.
    MacLaren, David J.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [19] Rosenblatt P.C., 2012, Journal of Family Theory Review, V4, P96, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1756-2589.2012.00120.X
  • [20] "Would You Decide to Keep the Power?": Reflexivity on the Interviewer- Interpreter-Interviewee Triad in Interviews with Female Punjabi Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
    Sanderson, Tessa
    Kumar, Kanta
    Serrant-Green, Laura
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 511 - 528