Co-Interviewing in Qualitative Social Research: Prospects, Merits and Considerations

被引:13
作者
Velardo, Stefania [1 ]
Elliott, Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Educ Psychol & Social Work, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS | 2021年 / 20卷
关键词
methods in qualitative inquiry; constructivist GT; ethical inquiry; community-based research; grounded theory; MULTIPLE INTERVIEWERS; REFLEXIVITY;
D O I
10.1177/16094069211054920
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, we seek to open a dialogue about the approach of co-interviewing, which, to our surprise, has not received much attention in the realm of qualitative social research. The co-interviewing approach stands apart from 'multiple' interviewing, in which two or more researchers are tasked with conducting interviews in a single research study. Instead, this approach involves two researchers actively taking part in the same interview. In a qualitative grounded theory study that sought to explore doctoral students' emotional well-being, we adopted the approach of co-interviewing each of our participants. This process involved us sharing the responsibilities of asking questions, probing, note taking and making observations. Our experience has led us to critically examine this unique approach to interviewing, and here, in this paper, we offer insights about its potential to enhance the generation of data and the research process. In doing so, we draw on literature, whilst reflecting on key concepts including power, reflexivity and well-being, by considering the positions of participants and researchers alike.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DIVERSITY HLTH SOCIA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy
  • [3] Atkinson M., 2012, KEY CONCEPTS SPORT E
  • [4] Barlow A., 2021, INT J QUAL METH, V20, P1, DOI [10.1177/16094069211016733, DOI 10.1177/16094069211016733]
  • [5] SAFETY IN NUMBERS - ON THE USE OF MULTIPLE INTERVIEWERS
    BECHHOFER, F
    ELLIOTT, B
    MCCRONE, D
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 18 (01): : 97 - 100
  • [6] Orienting multiple interviewers: The use of an interview orientation and standardized interview
    Boutain, Doris M.
    Hitti, Jane
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (09) : 1302 - 1309
  • [7] Dickson-Swift V., 2007, Qualitative Research, V7, P327, DOI [10.1177/1468794107078515, DOI 10.1177/1468794107078515, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515]
  • [8] The Road We Must Take: Multidisciplinary Team Science
    Disis, Mary L.
    Slattery, John T.
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (22)
  • [9] Research encounters, reflexivity and supervision
    Elliott, Heather
    Ryan, Joanna
    Hollway, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 15 (05) : 433 - 444
  • [10] Galletta A., 2013, MASTERING SEMISTRUCT