The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea

被引:2
作者
Ko, Chang Youl [1 ]
Jung, Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Jeju Natl Univ, Dept Accounting, Jeju City, South Korea
[2] Cheongju Univ, Dept Accounting, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
Cost stickiness; Export; R&D; VALUE-RELEVANCE; STICKINESS;
D O I
10.35611/jkt.2022.26.5.23
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear. Design/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020. This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model. Findings - The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve. When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms' resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases. Originality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms' R&D stickiness suggest that export firms' managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms' R&D activities.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 38
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Delivering the D in R&D: Increasing Product Outcomes from R&D Projects [J].
Lane, Joseph P. .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FROM ADAPTED EQUIPMENT TO INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 25 :736-741
[42]   Export profitability and firm R&D: on China's export diversification under trade war [J].
Liu, Duan ;
Wang, Qiuhong ;
Wang, Aidi ;
Yao, Shujie .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2023, 67 :151-166
[43]   Innovation, R&D cooperation and labor recruitment: evidence from Finland [J].
Simonen, Jaakko ;
McCann, Philip .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (02) :181-194
[44]   On the Market Reaction to Capitalization of R&D Expenditures: Evidence from ChiNext [J].
Kong, Li ;
Su, Huaitao .
EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (05) :1300-1311
[45]   Firm growth and R&D: Evidence from the Portuguese manufacturing industry [J].
Blandina Oliveira ;
Adelino Fortunato .
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2017, 27 :613-627
[46]   R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry [J].
Sharma, Chandan .
JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2012, 17 (02) :332-342
[47]   Does antidumping cause investment and R&D?: Evidence from Turkey [J].
Avsar, Veysel ;
Sevinc, Nurgul .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (52) :5674-5682
[48]   Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity [J].
Seru, Amit .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 111 (02) :381-405
[49]   Drivers of R&D investment in the defence industry: evidence from Spain [J].
Garcia-Estevez, Javier ;
Trujillo-Baute, Elisa .
DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2014, 25 (01) :39-49
[50]   Innovation, R&D cooperation and labor recruitment: evidence from Finland [J].
Jaakko Simonen ;
Philip McCann .
Small Business Economics, 2008, 31 :181-194